Literature DB >> 9428459

Compliance in CAPD and CCPD patients as measured by supply inventories during home visits.

J Bernardini1, B Piraino.   

Abstract

This study was performed to determine compliance with prescribed exchanges in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycler peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) patients via a home supply inventory, to evaluate numerous other factors against this standard, and to compare compliant and noncompliant patient characteristics and outcomes. It was an open enrollment of patients with prospective follow-up of 49 CAPD and CCPD adult patients at a university dialysis center. Two home visits for dialysis solution inventories were conducted 1 to 3 months apart. The number of exchanges actually performed (based on the inventory and deliveries) divided by the number of exchanges prescribed determined the percent compliance. Patient self-evaluation of compliance, attitudes about compliance and medical care, Derogatis Affects Balance Sheet (DABS) (a validated tool of affects balance), staff evaluations, patient demographics, hospitalizations, dialysis adequacy (measured to predicted creatinine ratio) and patient outcomes were evaluated against compliance with prescribed exchanges. Thirty-five percent of the patients were found to be noncompliant with prescribed exchanges based on the supply inventory, performing only 74% of exchanges. Compliant and noncompliant patients were not different by age, race, gender, peritoneal dialysis (PD) time, number of comorbid conditions, nor incidence of diabetes. The affects balance score from the DABS test was a poor predictor of compliance, as were staff evaluations. Delivered dialysis, adjusted for percentage of compliance, was significantly lower in noncompliant than in compliant patients by weekly Kt/V (2.2 v 1.74, P < 0.003), Ccreatinine L/week/1.73m2 (69 v 58, P = 0.05), as was normalized protein nitrogen appearance rates (nPNA), g/kg/day (0.89 v 0.70, P = 0.001). Technique survival was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in noncompliant patients. Twenty-nine percent of the noncompliant patients transferred to hemodialysis for uremia compared with 6% of compliant patients, P = .04, with a mean follow-up time of 1 year per patient. Patient survival did not differ in the two groups. Peritonitis rates were higher in noncompliant than compliant patients (1.03/yr v 0.66/yr, P < 0.03), as were days hospitalized (908 per 100 patient-years v 1,016 per 100 patient-years, P < 0.04). Noncompliance with PD exchanges is significantly common in CAPD and CCPD patients. It occurs in one third of the patients at our center and contributes significantly to technique failure, inadequate dialysis, and an increased risk of both peritonitis and hospitalized days. Home visits to conduct supply inventories provide an excellent method of monitoring compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9428459     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9428459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of home visits to pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Eileen N Ellis; Christine Blaszak; Sherida Wright; Andrea Van Lierop
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Ikechi G Okpechi; Brian L Rayner; Charles R Swanepoel
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Perspectives from the Kidney Health Initiative on Advancing Technologies to Facilitate Remote Monitoring of Patient Self-Care in RRT.

Authors:  Mitchell H Rosner; Susie Q Lew; Paul Conway; Jennifer Ehrlich; Robert Jarrin; Uptal D Patel; Karen Rheuban; R Brooks Robey; Neal Sikka; Eric Wallace; Patrick Brophy; James Sloand
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Adherence of pediatric patients to automated peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Annabelle N Chua; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  A contemporary approach to the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in children: the role of improvement science.

Authors:  Allison Redpath Mahon; Alicia M Neu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 6.  Can peritoneal dialysis be used as a long term therapy for end stage renal disease?

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Michele Buemi; Flavia Caputo; Giusto Viglino; Enrico Verrina
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on peritoneal dialysis in adults and children.

Authors:  Graham Woodrow; Stanley L Fan; Christopher Reid; Jeannette Denning; Andrew Neil Pyrah
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Non-adherence in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Haikel Asyraf Lim; Zhenli Yu; Marjorie Wai Yin Foo; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Remote Patient Management for Home Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Eric L Wallace; Mitchell H Rosner; Mark Dominik Alscher; Claus Peter Schmitt; Arsh Jain; Francesca Tentori; Catherine Firanek; Karen S Rheuban; Jose Florez-Arango; Vivekanand Jha; Marjorie Foo; Koen de Blok; Mark R Marshall; Mauricio Sanabria; Timothy Kudelka; James A Sloand
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.