Literature DB >> 9427490

Limitations of intraductal ultrasonography in differentiating between bile duct cancer in stage T1 and stage T2: in-vitro and in-vivo studies.

K Tamada1, N Kanai, N Ueno, M Ichiyama, T Tomiyama, S Wada, A Oohashi, T Nishizono, S Tano, T Aizawa, K Ido, K Kimura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We investigated whether intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) could distinguish between stage T1 and T2 bile duct cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In-vitro study. Resected bile duct specimens (n = 8) were immersed in a water tank and were pierced with straight pins to clarify the normal layer structure. Ultrasonosgraphic images (20MHz) of the positions of pin echoes were compared to the positions of pin holes as seen on histologic analysis of the specimens. In-vivo study. A thin-caliber high-frequency (6 Fr, 20 MHz) ultrasonic probe was inserted into the bile duct via a transhepatic route or a transpapillary route in 26 patients with bile duct cancer who underwent surgical resection.
RESULTS: In-vitro study. The inner hypoechoic layer on the IDUS image corresponded not only to the fibromuscular layer but also to a part of fibrous layer of the perimuscular loose connective tissue on histologic analysis, especially in the cases with moderate to severe bile duct wall fibrosis. The outer hyperechoic layer corresponded to the subserosal fat tissue. In-vivo study. In four of six patients with tumor limited to the inside hypoechoic layer on IDUS images, the histologic findings showed tumor invasion to the fibrous layer of the perimuscular loose connective tissue. Due to this limitation, accuracy of IDUS in T-staging was only 20/26 (77 %).
CONCLUSIONS: IDUS cannot reliably distinguish bile duct cancer in stage T1 from that in stage T2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9427490     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

1.  Intraductal ultrasound substantiates diagnostics of bile duct strictures of uncertain etiology.

Authors:  Tobias Meister; Hauke S Heinzow; Carina Woestmeyer; Philipp Lenz; Josef Menzel; Torsten Kucharzik; Wolfram Domschke; Dirk Domagk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Kiichi Tamada; Jun Ushio; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

3.  Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy with the combination of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.

Authors:  K Tamada; T Tomiyama; S Wada; A Ohashi; Y Satoh; K Ido; K Sugano
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Are the echogenicities on intraductal ultrasonography really biliary microlithiasis?

Authors:  Beom Jin Kim; Pung Kang; Jong Kyun Lee; Dong Hyun Sinn; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jong Chul Rhee; Jae Hoon Lim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  The role of intraductal ultrasonography in pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Bing Hu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.