Literature DB >> 9427007

Solution conformation of an essential region of the p53 transactivation domain.

M V Botuyan1, J Momand, Y Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The peptide segment surrounding residues Leu22 and Trp23 of the p53 transactivation domain plays a critical role in the transactivation activity of p53. This region binds basal transcriptional components such as the TATA-box binding protein associated factors TAFII40 and TAFII60 as well as the mdm-2 and adenovirus type 5 E1B 55 kDa oncoproteins.
RESULTS: The structure of residues 14-28 of p53 was studied by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and found to prefer a two-beta-turn structure stabilized by a hydrophobic cluster consisting of residues known to be important for transactivation and binding to p53-binding proteins. A peptide segment in which Leu22 and Trp23 were replaced by Gln and Ser displays a random structure.
CONCLUSIONS: This structural propensity observed in the wild-type p53 peptide is important for understanding the mechanism of transcriptional activation, because very few structural data are available on transactivation domains to date. These results should aid in the design of therapeutics that could competitively inhibit binding of p53 to the oncogene product mdm-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9427007     DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00047-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fold Des        ISSN: 1359-0278


  15 in total

1.  The alpha-helical FXXPhiPhi motif in p53: TAF interaction and discrimination by MDM2.

Authors:  M Uesugi; G L Verdine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structure of the p53 transactivation domain in complex with the nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CREB binding protein.

Authors:  Chul Won Lee; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Surface plasmon resonance and cytotoxicity assays of drug efficacies predicted computationally to inhibit p53/MDM2 interaction.

Authors:  Xiaoying Wang; Patrycja Magdziarz; Ernest Enriquez; Wang Zhao; Chris Quan; Narek Darabedian; Jamil Momand; Feimeng Zhou
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Direct observations of conformational distributions of intrinsically disordered p53 peptides using UV Raman and explicit solvent simulations.

Authors:  Kan Xiong; Matthew C Zwier; Nataliya S Myshakina; Virginia M Burger; Sanford A Asher; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Differences in the transactivation domains of p53 family members: a computational study.

Authors:  Jagadeesh N Mavinahalli; Arumugam Madhumalar; Roger W Beuerman; David P Lane; Chandra Verma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Recognition of the disordered p53 transactivation domain by the transcriptional adapter zinc finger domains of CREB-binding protein.

Authors:  Alexander S Krois; Josephine C Ferreon; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Impact of the K24N mutation on the transactivation domain of p53 and its binding to murine double-minute clone 2.

Authors:  Yingqian Ada Zhan; Hongwei Wu; Anne T Powell; Gary W Daughdrill; F Marty Ytreberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-07-22

Review 8.  Aggregation and Prion-Like Properties of Misfolded Tumor Suppressors: Is Cancer a Prion Disease?

Authors:  Danielly C F Costa; Guilherme A P de Oliveira; Elio A Cino; Iaci N Soares; Luciana P Rangel; Jerson L Silva
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  S100P Interacts with p53 while Pentamidine Inhibits This Interaction.

Authors:  Revansiddha H Katte; Deepu Dowarha; Ruey-Hwang Chou; Chin Yu
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-24

10.  Transient structure and dynamics in the disordered c-Myc transactivation domain affect Bin1 binding.

Authors:  Cecilia Andresen; Sara Helander; Alexander Lemak; Christophe Farès; Veronika Csizmok; Jonas Carlsson; Linda Z Penn; Julie D Forman-Kay; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Patrik Lundström; Maria Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.