Literature DB >> 9426379

Reproducibility of fat area measurements in young, non-obese subjects by computerized analysis of magnetic resonance images.

J M Elbers1, G Haumann, H Asscheman, J C Seidell, L J Gooren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess reproducibility, expressed as both inter-observer variability and intra-observer variability, of fat area measurements on images obtained by magnetic resonance (MR); to compare variability between fat area measurements, calculated from a single image per body region and from the average fat area of three images, and to determine reproducibility of image acquisition at the abdominal level.
SUBJECTS: Thirty young, non-obese subjects (reproducibility of image analysis) and nine young, non-obese subjects (reproducibility of image acquisition).
METHODS: Three MR images at the level of the abdomen (in 30 subjects) and at the level of the hip and thigh (in 14 of them). Quantification of subcutaneous fat depots (abdomen, hip and thigh) and visceral fat depots using an image-analyzing computer program. Assessment of variability of image analysis for fat area measurements between two observers and within observers. Assessment of reproducibility of image acquisition at the abdominal level (in nine subjects).
RESULTS: Subcutaneous fat areas in all body regions were quantified with coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from only 2.1%-4.9%. By contrast, visceral fat area measurements showed markedly higher CVs (range: 9.4%-17.6%). Moreover, relative variability was much larger in small visceral fat areas (CVs up to 25.6%). The majority of CVs, calculated for intra-observer variability and calculated from the average fat area measurements of three images, was lower than calculated for inter-observer variability and for one single image, respectively. In particular, for the visceral fat depot, this reduction in variability had practical consequences for the number of subjects required for a study. Variation of repeated image acquisition was in the same range as variation of repeated measurements on the same image.
CONCLUSION: One image per body site is sufficient to obtain a reliable estimate of subcutaneous fat depots. For estimations of the visceral fat depot, the average area measurements of three images reduces variability and increases statistical power. The availability of one single experienced observer during a study adds to accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9426379     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  10 in total

1.  Volume estimates by imaging methods: model comparisons with visible woman as the reference.

Authors:  Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Haiying Tang; Stanley Heshka; Mark Punyanitya; Shankuan Zhu; Jianbo Lei; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-02

Review 2.  Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification.

Authors:  Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Mark Punyanita; Jianbo Lei; Ahmet Sinav; John G Kral; Celina Imielinska; Robert Ross; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-01

3.  Quantitative comparison and evaluation of software packages for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Bonekamp; P Ghosh; S Crawford; S F Solga; A Horska; F L Brancati; A M Diehl; S Smith; J M Clark
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 4.  Pediatric obesity phenotyping by magnetic resonance methods.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Haiying Liu; Mark Punyanitya; Jun Chen; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Between-slice intervals in quantification of adipose tissue and muscle in children.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Jun Chen; Sofia Kwak; Mark Punyanitya; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2010-06-07

6.  Visceral adipose tissue: relationships between single slice areas at different locations and obesity-related health risks.

Authors:  W Shen; M Punyanitya; J Chen; D Gallagher; J Albu; X Pi-Sunyer; C E Lewis; C Grunfeld; S B Heymsfield; S Heshka
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mark Punyanitya; ZiMian Wang; Dympna Gallagher; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Jeanine Albu; Steven B Heymsfield; Stanley Heshka
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Automated separation of visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in in vivo microcomputed tomographies of mice.

Authors:  Svetlana Lublinsky; Yen K Luu; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  Quantification of adiposity in small rodents using micro-CT.

Authors:  S Judex; Y K Luu; E Ozcivici; B Adler; S Lublinsky; C T Rubin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Liver fat content in type 2 diabetes: relationship with hepatic perfusion and substrate metabolism.

Authors:  Luuk J Rijzewijk; Rutger W van der Meer; Mark Lubberink; Hildo J Lamb; Johannes A Romijn; Albert de Roos; Jos W Twisk; Robert J Heine; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Johannes W A Smit; Michaela Diamant
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 9.461

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.