Literature DB >> 9426181

Nuclear and non-nuclear targets of genotoxic agents in the induction of gene expression. Shared principles in yeast, rodents, man and plants.

P Herrlich1, C Blattner, A Knebel, K Bender, H J Rahmsdorf.   

Abstract

The interplay between environmental cues and the genetic response is decisive for the development, health and well-being of an organism. For some environmental factors a narrow margin separates beneficial and toxic impacts. With the increasing exposure to UV-B this dichotomy has reached public attention. This review will be concerned with the mechanisms that mediate a cellular genetic response to noxious agents. The toxic stimuli find access to the regulatory network inside cells by interacting at several points with cellular molecules - a process that converts the 'outside information' into 'cellular language'. As a consequence of such interactions, many adverse agents cause massive signal transduction and changes of gene expression. There is an interesting conservation of the mechanisms from yeast to man. An understanding of the genetic programs and of their phenotypic consequences is lagging behind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9426181     DOI: 10.1515/bchm.1997.378.11.1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Chem        ISSN: 1431-6730            Impact factor:   3.915


  13 in total

1.  Involvement of the acid sphingomyelinase pathway in uva-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Y Zhang; P Mattjus; P C Schmid; Z Dong; S Zhong; W Y Ma; R E Brown; A M Bode; H H Schmid; Z Dong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Regulation of ultraviolet light-induced gene expression by gene size.

Authors:  Bruce C McKay; Lawton J Stubbert; Casey C Fowler; Jennifer M Smith; Robin A Cardamore; Jennifer C Spronck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and intracellular distribution of the Auger electron emitter (65)Zn in two human cell lines.

Authors:  Ralf Kriehuber; Manuela Riedling; Myrtill Simkó; Dieter G Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent.

Authors:  S A Jelinsky; L D Samson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade.

Authors:  K Sakaguchi; J E Herrera; S Saito; T Miki; M Bustin; A Vassilev; C W Anderson; E Appella
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage.

Authors:  Michael Chang; Mohammed Bellaoui; Charles Boone; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  UV-Induced stabilization of c-fos and other short-lived mRNAs.

Authors:  C Blattner; P Kannouche; M Litfin; K Bender; H J Rahmsdorf; J F Angulo; P Herrlich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  c-Jun-dependent CD95-L expression is a rate-limiting step in the induction of apoptosis by alkylating agents.

Authors:  A Kolbus; I Herr; M Schreiber; K M Debatin; E F Wagner; P Angel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Sequential DNA damage-independent and -dependent activation of NF-kappaB by UV.

Authors:  K Bender; M Göttlicher; S Whiteside; H J Rahmsdorf; P Herrlich
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  GCN2 phosphorylation of eIF2alpha activates NF-kappaB in response to UV irradiation.

Authors:  Hao-Yuan Jiang; Ronald C Wek
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.