L Thomas1, E Foster, N B Schiller. 1. Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, 94142-0214, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common echocardiographic finding; however, there is no simple accurate method for quantification. The aim of this study was to develop an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR. BACKGROUND: The added regurgitant volume in MR increases the left atrial to left ventricular gradient, which then increases the peak mitral inflow or the peak E wave velocity. Our hypothesis was that peak E wave velocity and the E/A ratio increase in proportion to MR severity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients with varying grades of MR seen in the Adult Echocardiography Laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco. Peak E wave velocity, peak A wave velocity, E/A ratio and E wave deceleration time were measured in all patients. The reference standard for MR was qualitative echocardiographic evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Peak E wave velocity was seen to increase in proportion to MR severity, with a significant difference between the different groups (F = 37, p < 0.0001). Peak E wave velocity correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Furthermore, an E wave velocity >1.2 m/s identified 24 of 27 patients with severe MR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value 75%). An A wave dominant pattern excluded the presence of severe MR. The E/A ratio also increased in proportion to MR severity. Peak A wave velocity and E wave deceleration time showed no correlation with MR severity. CONCLUSIONS: Peak E wave velocity is easy to obtain and is therefore widely applicable in clinical practice as a screening tool for evaluating MR severity.
OBJECTIVES:Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common echocardiographic finding; however, there is no simple accurate method for quantification. The aim of this study was to develop an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR. BACKGROUND: The added regurgitant volume in MR increases the left atrial to left ventricular gradient, which then increases the peak mitral inflow or the peak E wave velocity. Our hypothesis was that peak E wave velocity and the E/A ratio increase in proportion to MR severity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients with varying grades of MR seen in the Adult Echocardiography Laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco. Peak E wave velocity, peak A wave velocity, E/A ratio and E wave deceleration time were measured in all patients. The reference standard for MR was qualitative echocardiographic evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Peak E wave velocity was seen to increase in proportion to MR severity, with a significant difference between the different groups (F = 37, p < 0.0001). Peak E wave velocity correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Furthermore, an E wave velocity >1.2 m/s identified 24 of 27 patients with severe MR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value 75%). An A wave dominant pattern excluded the presence of severe MR. The E/A ratio also increased in proportion to MR severity. Peak A wave velocity and E wave deceleration time showed no correlation with MR severity. CONCLUSIONS: Peak E wave velocity is easy to obtain and is therefore widely applicable in clinical practice as a screening tool for evaluating MR severity.
Authors: L Ascione; F Antonini-Canterin; F Macor; E Cervesato; F Chiarella; P Giannuzzi; P L Temporelli; F Gentile; D Lucci; A P Maggioni; L Tavazzi; L Badano; I Stoian; R Piazza; E Bosimini; D Pavan; G L Nicolosi Journal: Heart Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Maryse Palardy; Lynne W Stevenson; Gudaye Tasissa; Michele A Hamilton; Robert C Bourge; Thomas G Disalvo; Uri Elkayam; James A Hill; Sharon C Reimold Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Magd A Kotb; Inas Abd El Satar; Ahmed M Badr; Nancy H Anis; Hoda Abd El Rahman Ismail; Alaa F Hamza; Hesham M Abdelkader Journal: J Adv Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 10.479
Authors: M Di Marcello; E Terzo; C Locatelli; V Palermo; E Sala; E Dall'Aglio; C M Bussadori; I Spalla; P G Brambilla Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.333