Literature DB >> 9425640

Efficacy and tolerability of levodropropizine in adult patients with non-productive cough. Comparison with dextromethorphan.

E Catena1, L Daffonchio.   

Abstract

The results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial involving 209 adult patients of either sex with moderate non-productive cough are reported. The therapeutic efficacy and the tolerability of levodropropizine syrup (60 mg t.i.d. for 5 days) was evaluated in comparison with dextromethorphan syrup (15 mg t.i.d. for 5 days). Efficacy was assessed by the number of coughing spells in a 6h period, the cough frequency classes, the cough intensity and the night awakenings due to cough. Tolerability was evaluated by laboratory results, vital signs and any adverse event occurred during the clinical trial, including presence or absence of somnolence. Independently from the underlying pathology and from the degree of baseline cough severity, the number of coughing spells was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by both levodropropizine and dextromethorphan already after the 2nd day of treatment, the effect and its time of onset being similar for both drugs. Cough intensity was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced by both drugs throughout the treatment, at an earlier time with levodropropizine than with dextromethorphan. Concurrently with the relief of cough, the number of night awakenings was decreased remarkably and significantly (P < 0.05), with levodropropizine displaying an improvement significantly higher (P < 0.05) than dextromethorphan. No change in laboratory tests values was considered clinically relevant and vital signs were not clinically affected by the study drugs. The number of patients reporting adverse events was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the dextromethorphan (12.1%) than in the levodropropizine (3.6%) group. Overall, somnolence was reported for a low percentage of patients with both drugs, with the percentage of patients experiencing this side effect being one half in the group treated with levodropropizine (4.6%) as compared with dextromethorphan (10.4%). These results confirm the antitussive effectiveness of levodropropizine and point out a more favourable benefit/risk profile when compared to dextromethorphan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9425640     DOI: 10.1006/pupt.1997.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1094-5539            Impact factor:   3.410


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Good sense and nonsense of antitussive agents].

Authors:  A Gillissen; S Tasci; S Ewig; H Schäfer; S Zielen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Interventions for cough in cancer.

Authors:  Alex Molassiotis; Chris Bailey; Ann Caress; Jing-Yu Tan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-19

3.  An observational study on cough in children: epidemiology, impact on quality of sleep and treatment outcome.

Authors:  Francesco De Blasio; Peter V Dicpinigaitis; Bruce K Rubin; Gianluca De Danieli; Luigi Lanata; Alessando Zanasi
Journal:  Cough       Date:  2012-01-23

4.  Cough management: a practical approach.

Authors:  Francesco De Blasio; Johann C Virchow; Mario Polverino; Alessandro Zanasi; Panagiotis K Behrakis; Gunsely Kilinç; Rossella Balsamo; Gianluca De Danieli; Luigi Lanata
Journal:  Cough       Date:  2011-10-10

5.  Levodropropizine for treating cough in adult and children: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Zanasi; Luigi Lanata; Giovanni Fontana; Federico Saibene; Peter Dicpinigaitis; Francesco De Blasio
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2015-05-31

6.  Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating LC-Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Levodropropizine, Chloropheniramine, Methylparaben, Propylparaben, and Levodropropizine Impurities.

Authors:  Palakurthi Ashok Kumar; Thummala Veera Raghava Raju; Dongala Thirupathi; Ravindra Kumar; Jaya Shree
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2012-11-17

7.  Comprehensive evidence-based review on European antitussives.

Authors:  Alyn Morice; Peter Kardos
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2016-08-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.