Literature DB >> 9425027

Solution structures of DNA.RNA hybrids with purine-rich and pyrimidine-rich strands: comparison with the homologous DNA and RNA duplexes.

J I Gyi1, A N Lane, G L Conn, T Brown.   

Abstract

The structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), and r(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC) have been determined in solution from NMR data. Globally, the pure DNA and RNA duplexes were in the B and A forms, respectively. The two DNA.RNA hybrids were neither A nor B, but closer globally to the A than the B form. However, the thermodynamically less stable d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) duplex has a significantly different conformation from r(GAAGAGAAGC). d(GCTTCTCTTC). Structures were calculated based on the NMR data, using restrained molecular dynamics. A new approach to the treatment of conformational averaging based on a prioriprobabilities has been used. The nucleotides were treated by fitting the scalar coupling data and NOE time courses to a two-state model comprising N and S sugar puckers each with a different glycosidic torsion angle, and the mole fraction of the S state. Restraint sets for different distributions of N and S states within molecules were constructed, such that each nucleotide was weighted in the ensemble according to the mole fractions (or a prioriprobabilities). The individual nucleotide conformations were strongly restrained, whereas the internucleotide restraints were set relatively loosely. Ensembles of conformations were generated and assessed by comparison of the NOEs calculated from ensemble-averaged relaxation matrices with the experimental NOEs. The ensemble averages accounted for the experimental data much better than any individual member, or for structures calculated assuming a single unique conformation. The two hybrids populated different degrees of conformational space. There was a general trend in minor and major groove widths in the order d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) and a similar progression in global character from B-like to A-like structures. Furthermore, r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC) showed a greater dispersion of conformations in the ensemble than d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), reflecting the greater flexibility of the sugars. If conformational averaging of the nucleotides is ignored, incorrect virtual structures are produced that nevertheless are able to satisfy a substantial fraction of the experimental data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9425027     DOI: 10.1021/bi9719713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  37 in total

1.  The solution structure of [d(CGC)r(aaa)d(TTTGCG)](2): hybrid junctions flanked by DNA duplexes.

Authors:  S T Hsu; M T Chou; J W Cheng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The solution structure of [d(CGC)r(amamam)d(TTTGCG)]2.

Authors:  Y P Tsao; L Y Wang; S T Hsu; M L Jain; S H Chou; C Huang; J W Cheng
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Molecular requirements for degradation of a modified sense RNA strand by Escherichia coli ribonuclease H1.

Authors:  Daniel R Yazbeck; Kyung-Lyum Min; Masad J Damha
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The solution structure of a DNA*RNA duplex containing 5-propynyl U and C; comparison with 5-Me modifications.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Gyi; Daquan Gao; Graeme L Conn; John O Trent; Tom Brown; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  NMR structure of an alpha-L-LNA:RNA hybrid: structural implications for RNase H recognition.

Authors:  Jakob T Nielsen; Paul C Stein; Michael Petersen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  New insights into repeat instability: role of RNA•DNA hybrids.

Authors:  Elizabeth I McIvor; Urszula Polak; Marek Napierala
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  Unzipping of A-Form DNA-RNA, A-Form DNA-PNA, and B-Form DNA-DNA in the α-Hemolysin Nanopore.

Authors:  Rukshan T Perera; Aaron M Fleming; Amberlyn M Peterson; Jennifer M Heemstra; Cynthia J Burrows; Henry S White
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The interplay of primer-template DNA phosphorylation status and single-stranded DNA binding proteins in directing clamp loaders to the appropriate polarity of DNA.

Authors:  Jaclyn N Hayner; Lauren G Douma; Linda B Bloom
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Crystal structure of RNA-DNA duplex provides insight into conformational changes induced by RNase H binding.

Authors:  Ryan R Davis; Nadine M Shaban; Fred W Perrino; Thomas Hollis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Dynamics and stability of individual base pairs in two homologous RNA-DNA hybrids.

Authors:  Yuegao Huang; Congju Chen; Irina M Russu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.