Literature DB >> 9424394

Problems of measuring asthma prevalence.

T Kemp1, N Pearce, J Crane, R Beasley.   

Abstract

This review considers the issues involved in measuring the community prevalence of asthma, particularly in the context of international comparisons. We argue that there is no gold standard definition for measuring asthma prevalence, and discuss the currently available methods of case ascertainment. Prevalence studies, if they are to be generalizable, need to involve large sample sizes with high response rates. This necessitates methods that are simple, inexpensive and practicable, but also as sensitive and specific for asthma as possible. We discuss some of the issues that are specific to comparisons of asthma prevalence between diverse populations, and suggest that large surveys using written or video questionnaires of self reported symptoms validated in all of the target populations are the method of choice.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9424394     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.1996.tb00030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  8 in total

1.  Differences between infants and adults in the social aetiology of wheeze. The ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood.

Authors:  D Baker; J Henderson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Regional Variation in the Prevalence of Asthma Symptoms among Omani School Children: Comparisons from Two Nationwide Cross-sectional Surveys Six Years Apart.

Authors:  Omar A Al-Rawas; Bazdawi M Al-Riyami; Hussein Al-Kindy; Abdullah A Al-Maniri; Asya A Al-Riyami
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-07

3.  A comparison of three methods to measure asthma in epidemiologic studies: results from the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Susanne Hansen; Marin Strøm; Ekaterina Maslova; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Charlotta Granström; Sjurdur F Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Childhood asthma prevalence and risk factors in three Eastern European countries--the Belarus, Ukraine, Poland Asthma Study (BUPAS): an international prevalence study.

Authors:  Grzegorz Brozek; Joshua Lawson; Andrei Shpakou; Olga Fedortsiv; Leonid Hryshchuk; Donna Rennie; Jan Zejda
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Childhood asthma, asthma severity indicators, and related conditions along an urban-rural gradient: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joshua A Lawson; Donna C Rennie; Don W Cockcroft; Roland Dyck; Anna Afanasieva; Oluwafemi Oluwole; Jinnat Afsana
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 6.  Systematic review of worldwide variations of the prevalence of wheezing symptoms in children.

Authors:  Swatee P Patel; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Mark P Little
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Secular trends in consultations for asthma in early childhood, the 16 administrative regions of Morocco, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Mina Sadeq; Redouane Abouqal; Abdelilah ElMarnissi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Asthma incidence and risk factors in a national longitudinal sample of adolescent Canadians: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joshua A Lawson; Ian Janssen; Mark W Bruner; Alomgir Hossain; William Pickett
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.317

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.