Literature DB >> 9423698

Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery.

P M Upton1, P L Sadowsky, D M Sarver, T J Heaven.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the soft tissue profile "line drawings" predicted by Quick Ceph Image in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgical procedures. Preoperative (mean = 27.7 days presurgical) and posttreatment (mean = 11.5 months postsurgical) lateral cephalograms of 40 white patients (10 males and 30 females) who had completed treatment that involved orthodontics, one-piece LeFort I osteotomy, and mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with or without genioplasty were used in the study. Forty-five lateral hard and soft tissue landmarks were digitized, using the "on-screen" digitizing option, for each cephalogram and for each computer predicted posttreatment tracing. A customized analysis consisting of 24 linear and 4 angular measurements was used to analyze the differences between the actual posttreatment cephalometric landmark measurements and computer predicted landmark measurements. Statistically significant differences between the posttreatment cephalometric soft tissue profiles and the computer predicted soft tissue profiles were analyzed for the total sample, patients grouped according to: magnitude and direction of maxillary movements, adjunctive genioplasty procedure, V-Y closure of the LeFort I incision, and gender and age differences. The results indicated that for some of the soft tissue landmarks, differences were found between the posttreatment and the computer predicted profiles. Differences between the predicted and actual posttreatment soft tissue profiles may be attributed to the inaccuracy of Quick Ceph Image's default soft to hard tissue ratios when predicting the soft tissue response to combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9423698     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70231-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of current prediction imaging programs.

Authors:  J Dempsey Smith; Paul M Thomas; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Ulrich M Rieger; Rolf-Dieter Bader; Arndt Guentsch; Oliver Schaefer; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxillary osteotomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mariko Okudaira; Tatsuo Kawamoto; Takashi Ono; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07-16

4.  Morphologic outcome of bimaxillary surgery--an anthropometric appraisal.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Ulrich M Rieger; Andre Peisker; Gabriel Djedovic; Marta Gomez-Dammeier; Arndt Guentsch; Oliver Schaefer; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  Prediction of lip response to orthodontic treatment using a multivariable regression model.

Authors:  Amin Shirvani; Saeid Sadeghian; Safieh Abbasi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

6.  Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M S Ahmad Akhoundi; G Shirani; M Arshad; H Heidar; A Sodagar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Evaluation of the soft tissue treatment simulation module of a computerized cephalometric program.

Authors:  Aslihan Zeynep Oz; Cenk Ahmet Akcan; Hakan El; Semra Ciger
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.