BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) in young adults is a rare event. In the Framingham study, the 10-year incidence rate of MI per 1,000 was 12.9 in men 30-34 years old. Overall, 4-8% of patients with acute MI are < or = 40 years old. HYPOTHESIS: It was the purpose of this study to assess the in-hospital and long-term morbidity and mortality in patients < or = 40 years old with acute myocardial infarction compared with older patients in the thrombolytic era. METHODS: A consecutive series of 75 patients aged < or = 40 years (mean 35.0 +/- 4.8) with acute myocardial infarction was compared with an equally sized group of patients aged > 40 years (mean 65.1 +/- 9.8). RESULTS: Thrombolysis or direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in 52 versus 24% (p = 0.0004) and 5.3 versus 2.7% (p = NS) in younger and older patients, respectively. Significantly fewer young patients had multivessel disease (28 vs. 64%, p < 0.004). No in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with reperfusion therapy irrespective of age. After a mean followup time of 47 +/- 35 months, cardiac mortality was 0 and 11% (p < 0.03), respectively, in young and older patients with, and 3 versus 24% (p < 0.02) without reperfusion therapy, respectively. In addition, significantly fewer patients in the younger age group developed recurrent angina pectoris (12 vs. 39%, p = 0.0004) or congestive heart failure (9 vs. 34%, p = 0.0005) irrespective of reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Our observations demonstrate that long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction in young patients is excellent in the thrombolytic era.
BACKGROUND:Myocardial infarction (MI) in young adults is a rare event. In the Framingham study, the 10-year incidence rate of MI per 1,000 was 12.9 in men 30-34 years old. Overall, 4-8% of patients with acute MI are < or = 40 years old. HYPOTHESIS: It was the purpose of this study to assess the in-hospital and long-term morbidity and mortality in patients < or = 40 years old with acute myocardial infarction compared with older patients in the thrombolytic era. METHODS: A consecutive series of 75 patients aged < or = 40 years (mean 35.0 +/- 4.8) with acute myocardial infarction was compared with an equally sized group of patients aged > 40 years (mean 65.1 +/- 9.8). RESULTS: Thrombolysis or direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in 52 versus 24% (p = 0.0004) and 5.3 versus 2.7% (p = NS) in younger and older patients, respectively. Significantly fewer young patients had multivessel disease (28 vs. 64%, p < 0.004). No in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with reperfusion therapy irrespective of age. After a mean followup time of 47 +/- 35 months, cardiac mortality was 0 and 11% (p < 0.03), respectively, in young and older patients with, and 3 versus 24% (p < 0.02) without reperfusion therapy, respectively. In addition, significantly fewer patients in the younger age group developed recurrent angina pectoris (12 vs. 39%, p = 0.0004) or congestive heart failure (9 vs. 34%, p = 0.0005) irrespective of reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Our observations demonstrate that long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction in young patients is excellent in the thrombolytic era.
Authors: Junjie Yang; David W Biery; Avinainder Singh; Sanjay Divakaran; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Wanda Y Wu; Josh Klein; Jon Hainer; Mattheus Ramsis; Pradeep Natarajan; James L Januzzi; Khurram Nasir; Deepak L Bhatt; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Eddie D Davenport; Thomas Syburra; Gary Gray; Rienk Rienks; Dennis Bron; Olivier Manen; Joanna d'Arcy; Norbert J Guettler; Edward D Nicol Journal: Heart Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.994