Literature DB >> 9422005

Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities.

M E Young1, M A Nosek, C Howland, G Chanpong, D H Rintala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emotional, physical, and sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities is a problem largely unrecognized by rehabilitation service providers. This article documents the prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities compared to women without physical disabilities.
DESIGN: Case-comparison study using written survey. Data were analyzed using chi 2 analyses and the Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon rank sum W tests.
SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 860 women, 439 with physical disabilities and 421 without physical disabilities, was compiled from women responding to a national sexuality survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The women were asked if they had ever experienced emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. If they answered yes, they were asked to identify the perpetrator(s) of the abuse and when the abuse began and ended.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of both groups of women had experienced some type of abuse at some point in their lives. Of women who had experienced abuse, half of each group had experienced physical or sexual abuse. Husbands or live-in partners were the most common perpetrators of emotional or physical abuse for both groups. Male strangers were the most common perpetrators of sexual abuse for both groups. Women with physical disabilities also were more likely to be abused by their attendants and by health care providers. Thirteen percent of women with physical disabilities described experiencing physical or sexual abuse in the past year.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with physical disabilities appear to be at risk for emotional, physical, and sexual abuse to the same extent as women without physical disabilities. Prevalence of abuse by husbands or live-in partners in this study is similar to estimates of lifetime occurrence of domestic violence for women living in the United States. Women with physical disabilities are more at risk for abuse by attendants or health care providers. They are also more likely to experience a longer duration of abuse than women without physical disabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9422005     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90219-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

Review 1.  The challenging pelvic examination.

Authors:  Carol K Bates; Nina Carroll; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Unwanted sex among young adults in the United States: the role of physical disability and cognitive performance.

Authors:  Abigail A Haydon; Annie-Laurie McRee; Carolyn Tucker Halpern
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2011-05-20

3.  Physical abuse around the time of pregnancy among women with disabilities.

Authors:  Monika Mitra; Susan E Manning; Emily Lu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

4.  A scoping review of measurement of violence against women and disability.

Authors:  Sarah R Meyer; Heidi Stöckl; Cecilia Vorfeld; Kaloyan Kamenov; Claudia García-Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intimate Partner Violence among Women with Disabilities in Uganda.

Authors:  Anne Valentine; Ilhom Akobirshoev; Monika Mitra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Violence against Canadian Women.

Authors:  Marsha M Cohen; Heather Maclean
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Sexual Violence Against Persons With Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amylee Mailhot Amborski; Eve-Line Bussières; Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel; Christian C Joyal
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2021-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.