Literature DB >> 9421573

Need probability affects retention: a direct demonstration.

R B Anderson1, R D Tweney, M Rivardo, S Duncan.   

Abstract

Recent memory theory has emphasized the concept of need probability--that is, the probability that a given piece of learned information will be tested at some point in the future. It has been proposed that, in real-world situations, need probability declines over time and that the memory-loss rate is calibrated to match the progressive reduction in need probability (J.R. Anderson & Schooler, 1991). The present experiments were designed to examine the influence of the slope of the need-probability curve on the slope of the retention curve. On each of several trials, subjects memorized a list of digits, then retained the digits in memory for 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 sec. Some trials ended with a recall test; other trials ended with the message, "no test." In Experiment 1, the likelihood of encountering a memory test (i.e., the need probability) was made to either increase or decrease as the retention interval increased; in Experiment 2, need probability either was flat (invariant across retention intervals) or decreased as the retention interval increased. The results indicated that the shape of the need-probability curve influenced the slope of the retention curve (Experiment 1) and that the effect became larger as the experimental session progressed (Experiment 2). The findings support the notion that memory adapts to need probabilities and that the rate of forgetting is influenced by the slope of the need-probability curve. In addition, all of the forgetting curves approximated a power function, suggesting that need probability influences the slope but not the form of forgetting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421573     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Learning-forgetting independence, unidimensional memory models, and feature models: comment on Bogartz (1990).

Authors:  G R Loftus; D Bamber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Artifactual power curves in forgetting.

Authors:  R B Anderson; R D Tweney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

5.  Neural events and the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Very rapid forgetting.

Authors:  P Muter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-03
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  The power law as an emergent property.

Authors:  R B Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

2.  The competition-among-relations-in-nominals theory of conceptual combination: implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Timing, remembering, and discrimination.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Artifactual power curves in forgetting.

Authors:  R B Anderson; R D Tweney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

5.  Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition: Evidence from syntactic processing.

Authors:  Mark Myslín; Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-19

6.  Reflections of the social environment in chimpanzee memory: applying rational analysis beyond humans.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; Julian N Marewski; Lael J Schooler; Ian C Gilby
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.