Literature DB >> 9421316

Comparison of the effect of cefepime with four cephalosporins against pneumococci with various susceptibilities to penicillin, in vitro and in the mouse peritonitis model.

J D Knudsen1, K Fuursted, N Frimodt-Møller, F Espersen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect, both in vitro and in vivo, of cefepime with those of four other cephalosporins, namely ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cephalothin, against penicillin-resistant pneumococci. One hundred pneumococcal strains, 31 penicillin-susceptible, 30 penicillin-intermediate-resistant and 39 penicillin-resistant pneumococci, were used in MIC studies. Time-kill experiments were carried out for four strains. In the mouse peritonitis model, the dose that gave protection to 50% of mice challenged with a lethal dose of pneumococci (ED50) was determined for three pneumococci and five cephalosporins. The MICs of all five cephalosporins and penicillin correlated significantly with each other. In vitro, the most potent cephalosporins against pneumococci were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime, followed by cefuroxime and cephalothin. In time-kill experiments, carried out for four pneumococci, no differences were found in the killing effect of these five cephalosporins in relation to MICs. In the mouse peritonitis model, there was no significant correlation between log(MIC) and log(ED50) for the five cephalosporins against three pneumococci (Spearman's rho = 0.39, P = 0.16). However, if the values for cefepime against the three pneumococci were excluded, there was a significant correlation for the remaining four cephalosporins (Spearman's rho = 0.62, P = 0.04). For all three pneumococci, the ED50s of cefepime were lower than expected from the MICs. It was not possible to explain this beneficial difference in the effect of cefepime in terms of in-vitro bactericidal activities, serum protein binding or pharmacodynamic parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421316     DOI: 10.1093/jac/40.5.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Combined with Tazobactam against Clinically Relevant Enterobacteriaceae in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model.

Authors:  Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Claudia Lagarde; Jan den Hartigh; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Influence of E. coli lipopolysaccharide induced fever on the plasma kinetics of cefepime in cross-bred calves.

Authors:  Y G Pawar; S K Sharma
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) calves after single intravenous injection.

Authors:  Abdullah Altayban; Mahmoud Kandeel; Amin Tahoun; Mohammed Al-Nazawi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Antibiotic selection of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 in a mouse intestinal colonization model.

Authors:  Frederik Boetius Hertz; Anders Løbner-Olesen; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vivo activity of ceftobiprole in murine skin infections due to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jeffrey Fernandez; Jamese J Hilliard; Darren Abbanat; Wenyan Zhang; John L Melton; Colleen M Santoro; Robert K Flamm; Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics for treating experimental peritonitis in mice due to Klebsiella pneumoniae producing the carbapenemase OXA-48.

Authors:  Olivier Mimoz; Nicolas Grégoire; Laurent Poirel; Manuella Marliat; William Couet; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Subcutaneous pharmacokinetics and dosage regimen of cefotaxime in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis).

Authors:  Suresh Kumar Sharma; Anil Kumar Srivastava
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Effects of Antibiotics on the Intestinal Microbiota of Mice.

Authors:  Frederik Boetius Hertz; Andries E Budding; Malieka van der Lugt-Degen; Paul H Savelkoul; Anders Løbner-Olesen; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.