Literature DB >> 9421314

In-vitro studies of the activity of glycopeptide combinations against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.

I Foley1, P Gilbert.   

Abstract

Perfused biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis reached a pseudo-steady state, with respect to bioburden and the numbers of cells liberated within the perfusates. Biofilm growth rate was slow (approximately 0.006 doublings/h) relative to batch culture (approximately 0.01 doublings/h). MICs were determined for vancomycin (0.12 mg/L) and teicoplanin (1.2 mg/L) in batch culture. Steady-state biofilms (24 h and 48 h) were perfused continuously for 96 h with medium containing antibiotic at 4 X MIC. Susceptibility was assessed as cfu in the perfusate, indicating growth inhibition, and as cfu for the parent biofilm. Vancomycin at these levels had little or no effect on either parameter, whilst teicoplanin produced a temporary (30 h) reduction in growth rate (99.99% for 24 h biofilms, 50% for 48 h biofilms). Antibiotic concentrations were raised to therapeutic (trough) levels (vancomycin, 5 mg/L; teicoplanin, 12 mg/L) and applied continuously to 24 h old biofilms. Neither agent affected viability of the biofilm over 96 h. Biofilm growth rate, however, was decreased markedly over the first 8-10 h of antibiotic treatment and was maintained at the reduced level for approximately 40 h. Thereafter growth of the biofilms gradually returned to pre-exposure levels. The pattern of recovery was different for the two agents suggesting that different mechanisms might be involved. Accordingly biofilms were exposed to successive and concurrent 24 h treatments with vancomycin (5 mg/L) and teicoplanin (12 mg/L). This led not only to a further 2-3 log reduction in the growth rate but also to a 3 log reduction in the viability of the parent biofilm. Such synergy between the glycopeptide agents might have therapeutic implications for the treatment of E. faecalis infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421314     DOI: 10.1093/jac/40.5.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

1.  Enterococcus faecalis mammalian virulence-related factors exhibit potent pathogenicity in the Arabidopsis thaliana plant model.

Authors:  Ajay K Jha; Harsh P Bais; Jorge M Vivanco
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation.

Authors:  A Toledo-Arana; J Valle; C Solano; M J Arrizubieta; C Cucarella; M Lamata; B Amorena; J Leiva; J R Penadés; I Lasa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Christopher J Kristich; Yung-Hua Li; Dennis G Cvitkovitch; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Development and use of an efficient system for random mariner transposon mutagenesis to identify novel genetic determinants of biofilm formation in the core Enterococcus faecalis genome.

Authors:  Christopher J Kristich; Vy T Nguyen; Thinh Le; Aaron M T Barnes; Suzanne Grindle; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Modelling biofilm-induced formation damage and biocide treatment in subsurface geosystems.

Authors:  C C Ezeuko; A Sen; I D Gates
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  EndoE from Enterococcus faecalis hydrolyzes the glycans of the biofilm inhibiting protein lactoferrin and mediates growth.

Authors:  Julia Garbe; Jonathan Sjögren; Eoin F J Cosgrave; Weston B Struwe; Marta Bober; Anders I Olin; Pauline M Rudd; Mattias Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of myrcia ovata cambess. Essential oil on planktonic growth of gastrointestinal microorganisms and biofilm formation of enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Cinthya S Cândido; Cadmo Silton A Portella; Bruno J Laranjeira; Sérgio S da Silva; Angela M C Arriaga; Gilvandete M P Santiago; Geovany A Gomes; Paulo César Almeida; Cibele B M Carvalho
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.