Literature DB >> 9418694

Tubal patency and fertility outcome after expectant management of ectopic pregnancy.

M Rantala1, J Mäkinen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study tubal patency and fertility outcome of patients with expectantly managed ectopic pregnancy (EP).
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland. PATIENT(S): Thirty patients who wanted to become pregnant again were treated successfully by expectant management of EP. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were examined with posttreatment hysterosalpingography, and they filled out a questionnaire about their subsequent pregnancies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Free passage through open lumen showing tubal patency; number of full-term pregnancies and EPs revealing relative rate of subsequent fertility. RESULT(S): A free passage through the diseased tube was seen in 93% of the cases (28 of 30). Two of the 24 patients (8.4%) who wanted to become pregnant had an obstruction in the diseased tube. One (4.2%) of them had a normal opposite tube and later had a normal pregnancy. The other (4.2%) had an obstruction in both tubes and subsequently had a repeat EP. One of the 6 patients had an EP (this patient did not want to become pregnant and did not use contraception). However, her posttreatment hysterosalpingography was normal. In total, the subsequent pregnancy rate was 88% (21 of 24), and the rate of repeat EP was 4.2% (1 of 24). CONCLUSION(S): Patients who are treated with expectant management have a good long-term fertility outcome. Spontaneous regression of EP does not lead to increased harm or damage to the tube, i.e., the risk for repeat EP is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9418694     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00414-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

Review 2.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

Review 3.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

4.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 5.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-20

6.  The impact of expectant management, systemic methotrexate and surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  E Demirdag; I Guler; S Abay; Y Oguz; M Erdem; A Erdem
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Comparison the Results of Hysterosalpangiography in Patients with Ectopic Pregnancy Treated by Laparoscopic Salpingostomy, Laparotomy, and Treated with Methotrexate.

Authors:  Behnaz Khani; Mina Ahmadi; Safoura Rouholamin
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2022-03-30

8.  Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic salpingostomy and conservative expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Kunitomo Takashima; Hiroshi Yoshida; Mariko Murase; Aya Sato; Hideya Sakakibara; Fumiki Hirahara; Masahiko Ishikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-01

9.  Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β- hCG) Clearance Curves in Women with Successfully Expectantly Managed Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Samir Helmy; Dimitrios Mavrelos; Elinor Sawyer; Jara Ben-Nagi; Marianne Koch; Andrea Day; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unexpected outcome after expectant management of ectopic pregnancy in two persons.

Authors:  Reihaneh Hosseini; Zahra Asgari; Ashraf Moini
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.