Literature DB >> 9417974

Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: a positron emission tomography study.

S M Kosslyn1, W L Thompson, N M Alpert.   

Abstract

Subjects participated in perceptual and imagery tasks while their brains were scanned using positron emission tomography. In the perceptual conditions, subjects judged whether names were appropriate for pictures. In one condition, the objects were pictured from canonical perspectives and could be recognized at first glance; in the other, the objects were pictured from noncanonical perspectives and were not immediately recognizable. In this second condition, we assume that top-down processing is used to evaluate the names. In the imagery conditions, subjects saw a grid with a single X mark; a lowercase letter was presented before the grid. In the baseline condition, they simply responded when they saw the stimulus, whereas in the imagery condition they visualized the corresponding block letter in the grid and decided whether it would have covered the X if it were physically present. Fourteen areas were activated in common by both tasks, only 1 of which may not be involved in visual processing (the precentral gyrus); in addition, 2 were activated in perception but not imagery, and 5 were activated in imagery but not perception. Thus, two-thirds of the activated areas were activated in common. Copyright 1997 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9417974     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Central processing of rectal pain: a functional MR imaging study.

Authors:  M V Baciu; B L Bonaz; E Papillon; R A Bost; J F Le Bas; J Fournet; C M Segebarth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Squinting with the mind's eye: effects of stimulus resolution on imaginal and perceptual comparisons.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; K E Sukel; B M Bly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

4.  Task relevance enhances early transient and late slow-wave activity of distributed cortical sources.

Authors:  C J Aine; J M Stephen; R Christner; D Hudson; E Best
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Visual imagery can impede reasoning.

Authors:  Markus Knauff; P N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

6.  Diminished top-down control underlies a visual imagery deficit in normal aging.

Authors:  Jonathan Kalkstein; Kristen Checksfield; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Cameron B Jeter; Dongni Yang; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Comparison of the neural basis for imagined writing and drawing.

Authors:  Greg S Harrington; Dana Farias; Christine H Davis; Michael H Buonocore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Accessing the mental space-Spatial working memory processes for language and vision overlap in precuneus.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Ethan Weed; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen; Andreas Roepstorff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.