Literature DB >> 9417209

Doppler tissue imaging: myocardial wall motion velocities in normal subjects.

P Palka1, A Lange, A D Fleming, G R Sutherland, L N Fenn, W N McDicken.   

Abstract

With a scanner modified for Doppler tissue imaging, mean myocardial velocities (MMV) across the myocardium were measured. The aim of this study was to determine the normal range of the maximum MMV in six standardized phases of the cardiac cycle. The MMV was defined as the average value of the myocardial velocity measured along each M-mode scan line throughout the thickness of the myocardium. The maximum MMV was defined as the maximum value of the MMV during the particular cardiac phase. Simultaneous gray-scale and Doppler tissue imaging M-mode images were taken of the interventricular septum and the left ventricular posterior wall from the parasternal long-axis and short-axis views in 15 normal volunteers (aged 21 to 47 years; mean 32 +/- 6 years). Each cardiac cycle was divided into six phases: atrial contraction, isovolumetric contraction, ventricular ejection, isovolumetric relaxation, rapid ventricular filling, and diastasis. Isovolumetric contraction, isovolumetric relaxation, and diastasis were subdivided into two parts a and b because of changes in the direction of the myocardial movement. For each volunteer, the mean and standard deviation of the maximum MMV were measured for each cardiac phase averaged from 12 cardiac cycles from both long-axis and short-axis views. Finally, the mean and standard deviation were taken for each cardiac phase from 180 cardiac cycles from 15 volunteers. We have found that specific cardiac phases show significant differences in the maximum MMV between the adjoining cardiac phases and significant differences also occur between the maximum MMV measured in the interventricular septum and the left ventricular posterior wall during the same cardiac phases. These normal values provide a standard against which future Doppler tissue imaging M-mode studies of abnormal left ventricular function might be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9417209     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(05)80380-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  23 in total

Review 1.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound. Part 3: Cardiac applications.

Authors:  C M Moran; W N McDicken; P R Hoskins; P J Fish
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Doppler myocardial imaging in the assessment of normal and ischemic myocardial function--past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Strotmann; L Hatle; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Effect of simulated dives on diastolic function in healthy men.

Authors:  Jochen Hansel; Kay Tetzlaff; Detlef Axmann; Andreas M Niess; Christof Burgstahler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Analysis and processing of laser Doppler perfusion monitoring signals recorded from the beating heart.

Authors:  M G D Karlsson; H Casimir-Ahn; U Lönn; K Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Effect of simulated diving trips on pulmonary artery pressure in healthy men.

Authors:  Jochen Hansel; Christof Burgstahler; Sabine Medler; Detlef Axmann; Andreas M Niess; Kay Tetzlaff
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Left ventricular function in professional football players evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging and strain imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Tümüklü; Ilker Etikan; Cahide Soydaş Cinar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Abnormalities of left atrial function after cardioversion: an atrial strain rate study.

Authors:  L Thomas; T McKay; K Byth; T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Cardiac remodeling in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Authors:  F Galetta; G Bernini; F Franzoni; A Bacca; I Fivizzani; L Tocchini; M Bernini; P Fallahi; A Antonelli; G Santoro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Tissue Doppler imaging and the quantification of myocardial function.

Authors:  R Rambaldi; D Poldermans; W B Vletter; J J Bax; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-08

10.  Does Doppler myocardial imaging give new insights or simply old information revisited?

Authors:  G R Sutherland; A Lange; P Palka; N Grubb; A Fleming; W N McDicken
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.