Literature DB >> 9416592

Managing space motion sickness.

R T Jennings1.   

Abstract

Space motion sickness is a well-recognized problem for space flight and affects 73% of crewmembers on the first 2 or 3 days of their initial flight. Illness severity is variable, but over half of cases are categorized as moderate to severe. Management has included elimination of provocative activities and delay of critical performance-related procedures such as extra-vehicular activity (EVA) or Shuttle landing during the first three days of missions. Pharmacological treatment strategies have had variable results, but intramuscular promethazine has been the most effective to date with a 90% initial response rate and important reduction in residual symptoms the next flight day. Oral prophylactic treatment of crewmembers with difficulty on prior flights has had mixed results. In order to accommodate more aggressive pharmacologic management, crew medical officers receive additional training in parenteral administration of medications. Preflight medication testing is accomplished to reduce the risk of unexpected performance decrements or idiosyncratic reactions. When possible, treatment is offered in the presleep period to mask potential treatment-related drowsiness. Another phenomenon noted by crewmembers and physicians as flights have lengthened is readaptation difficulty or motion sickness on return to Earth. These problems have included nausea, vomiting, and difficulty with locomotion or coordination upon early exposure to gravity. Since landing and egress are principal concerns during this portion of the flight, these deficits are of operational concern. Postflight therapy has been directed at nausea and vomiting, and meclizine and promethazine are the principal agents used. There has been no official attempt at prophylactic treatment prior to entry. Since there is considerable individual variation in postflight deficit and since adaptation from prior flights seems to persist, it has been recommended that commanders with prior shuttle landing experience be named to flights of extended duration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9416592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Changes in gastric myoelectric activity during space flight.

Authors:  Deborah L Harm; Gwenn R Sandoz; Robert M Stern
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Space motion sickness.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul Dizio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Microgravity Simulated by the 6° Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest Test Increases Intestinal Motility but Fails to Induce Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Space Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Meher Prakash; Ron Fried; Oliver Götze; Francisca May; Petra Frings-Meuthen; Edwin Mulder; Judit Valentini; Mark Fox; Michael Fried; Werner Schwizer; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Reflex control of the spine and posture: a review of the literature from a chiropractic perspective.

Authors:  Mark W Morningstar; Burl R Pettibon; Heidi Schlappi; Mark Schlappi; Trevor V Ireland
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-08-09

5.  Stability Studies of UV Laser Irradiated Promethazine and Thioridazine after Exposure to Hypergravity Conditions.

Authors:  Ágota Simon; Tatiana Tozar; Adriana Smarandache; Mihai Boni; Alexandru Stoicu; Alan Dowson; Jack J W A van Loon; Mihail Lucian Pascu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  No Gain No Pain: Relations Between Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes and Motion Sickness in Mice.

Authors:  Erwin Idoux; Michele Tagliabue; Mathieu Beraneck
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.