Literature DB >> 9416352

Assessment of the CAMINO intracranial pressure device in clinical practice.

L Schürer1, E Münch, A Piepgras, R Weigel, L Schilling, P Schmiedek.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, handling characteristics and complication rate of the CAMINO-ICP-monitor-system in clinical routine. In a case controlled study 82 patients with intracranial pathology necessitating ICP-monitoring received either a ventricular or a parenchymal CAMINO-device. Clinical assessment of curve shape and apparent reliability of the measurement was documented. Probe position and presence of hematoma was evaluated in all patients with a CT after probe insertion. Handling complications, i.e. dislocation were recorded. At the end of the measuring period the drift of the probe was checked ex vivo and a two point calibration was performed using a water column. During one year 82 patients received 95 probes (parench, 73. ventric. 22). The average measuring period was 91.3 +/- 70.6 hrs. Catheter position was verified by CCT for 67 (70.5%) probes. 92.5% of the devices were placed correctly. Clinically 88.4% of the measurements were assessed plausible, in 8.2% the displayed ICP-values were judged to be too high, in 2.1% too low. Probe drift after explanation was -0.21 mmHg/24 hrs. The mean value of the recalibrated probes in the water column corresponding to 15.8 mmHg was 14.7 +/- 1.9 mmHg. There was no correlation between neither drift nor function in the water column and the duration of the measurement. Technical complications exclusively related to the construction of the CAMINO-system like kinking of the cable, dislocation (probe pulled out) or dislocated fixation screw were too high (25.3%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9416352     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6837-0_92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  4 in total

Review 1.  Escalation therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: how long is intracranial pressure monitoring necessary?

Authors:  Pasquale Anania; Denise Battaglini; John P Miller; Alberto Balestrino; Alessandro Prior; Alessandro D'Andrea; Filippo Badaloni; Paolo Pelosi; Chiara Robba; Gianluigi Zona; Pietro Fiaschi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Performance characteristics of a new generation pressure microsensor for physiologic applications.

Authors:  Patrick S Cottler; Whitney R Karpen; Duane A Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Escalate and De-Escalate Therapies for Intracranial Pressure Control in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Pasquale Anania; Patricia R M Rocco; Iole Brunetti; Alessandro Prior; Gianluigi Zona; Paolo Pelosi; Pietro Fiaschi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.