Literature DB >> 9415986

Computational gene identification: an open problem.

R Guigó1.   

Abstract

As the Human Genome Project enters the large-scale sequencing phase, computational gene identification methods are becoming essential for the automatic analysis and annotation of large uncharacterized genomic sequences. Currently available computer programs relying mainly on sequence coding statistics are of great use in pin-pointing regions in genomic sequences containing exons. Such programs perform rather poorly, however, when the problem is to fully elucidate gene structure. For this problem, the DNA sequence signals involved in the specification of the genes--start sites and splice sites--carry a lot of information, and simple methods relying on such information can predict gene structure with an accuracy to some extent comparable to that of other more sophisticated computational methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415986     DOI: 10.1016/s0097-8485(97)00008-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Chem        ISSN: 0097-8485


  12 in total

1.  An assessment of gene prediction accuracy in large DNA sequences.

Authors:  R Guigó; P Agarwal; J F Abril; M Burset; J W Fickett
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Computational gene finding in plants.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Re-annotating the Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome sequence: adding value, function and reading frames.

Authors:  T Dandekar; M Huynen; J T Regula; B Ueberle; C U Zimmermann; M A Andrade; T Doerks; L Sánchez-Pulido; B Snel; M Suyama; Y P Yuan; R Herrmann; P Bork
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  DNA splice site detection: a comparison of specific and general methods.

Authors:  Won Kim; W John Wilbur
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 5.  Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Catherine Mathé; Marie-France Sagot; Thomas Schiex; Pierre Rouzé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Fugu ESTs: new resources for transcription analysis and genome annotation.

Authors:  Melody S Clark; Yvonne J K Edwards; Dan Peterson; Sandra W Clifton; Amanda J Thompson; Masahide Sasaki; Yutaka Suzuki; Kiyoshi Kikuchi; Shugo Watabe; Koichi Kawakami; Sumio Sugano; Greg Elgar; Stephen L Johnson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A computational approach to the inference of sphingolipid pathways from the genome of Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Do; Tae-Kyu Park; Dong-Kug Choi
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3'-processing sites.

Authors:  Joel H Graber; Gregory D McAllister; Temple F Smith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  SECIS elements in the coding regions of selenoprotein transcripts are functional in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Heiko Mix; Alexey V Lobanov; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Evaluating high-throughput ab initio gene finders to discover proteins encoded in eukaryotic pathogen genomes missed by laboratory techniques.

Authors:  Stephen J Goodswen; Paul J Kennedy; John T Ellis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.