Literature DB >> 9415719

Site-directed mutagenesis on the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: the significance of Tyr403 in the binding of agonists and functional coupling.

W K Vogel1, D M Sheehan, M I Schimerlik.   

Abstract

The first step in the transmembrane signal mediated by G protein-coupled receptors is binding of agonist to receptors at the cell surface. The mechanism of the resulting receptor activation is not clear, but models based on the ternary complex model are capable of explaining most of the observations that have been reported in G protein-coupled receptors. This model suggests that a single agonist/receptor/G protein complex capable of activating G protein is formed as the result of agonist binding. Extensions of this basic model differ primarily in whether an equilibrium between active and inactive conformations is required to explain experimental results. We report results on ligand binding and coupling to physiological effector systems of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor site-directed mutant Y403F (residue 403 mutated from tyrosine to phenylalanine) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and compare our results with results reported for the homologous Y506F mutation in the m3 muscarinic receptor [J. Biol. Chem. 267:19313-19319 (1992)]. The mutation in the m2 muscarinic receptor reduced absolute agonist affinities more dramatically than in the m3 muscarinic receptor. Unlike the results reported for the m3 subtype mutant, in which coupling to physiological effector systems was reduced, coupling to effector systems for the mutant in the m2 subtype was robust. In the Y403F m2 muscarinic receptor, the difference between the two agonist binding affinities was greater than in the wild-type receptor, whereas in the m3 subtype, the effect of the mutation was to decrease this difference. A prediction of the ternary complex model is that relative binding affinities will affect the steady state concentration of the agonist/receptor/G protein complex and, as the result, the extent of G protein coupling. These results can best be rationalized by this model, which suggests that the activation of G protein-coupled receptors is achieved by the relative affinity of agonist for two receptor states and does not require the existence of multiple states in conformational equilibrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415719     DOI: 10.1124/mol.52.6.1087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  7 in total

1.  The molecular basis for high affinity of a universal ligand for human bombesin receptor (BnR) family members.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Uehara; Simon J Hocart; Nieves González; Samuel A Mantey; Tomoo Nakagawa; Tatsuro Katsuno; David H Coy; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Accelerated structure-based design of chemically diverse allosteric modulators of a muscarinic G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Dahlia Anne Goldfeld; Ee Von Moo; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; J Andrew McCammon; Celine Valant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Compartmentation of cAMP signaling in cardiac myocytes: a computational study.

Authors:  Radu V Iancu; Stephen W Jones; Robert D Harvey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  CHRM2 but not CHRM1 or CHRM3 polymorphisms are associated with asthma susceptibility in Mexican patients.

Authors:  Silvia Jiménez-Morales; Juan Luis Jiménez-Ruíz; Blanca Estela Del Río-Navarro; Efraín Navarro-Olivos; Guillermo Escamilla-Guerrero; Ram Savan; Michael Dean; Lorena Orozco
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Autoantibodies enhance agonist action and binding to cardiac muscarinic receptors in chronic Chagas' disease.

Authors:  Ciria C Hernandez; Jose H Nascimento; Elen A Chaves; Patricia C Costa; Masako O Masuda; Eleonora Kurtenbach; Antonio C Campos DE Carvalho; Luis E Gimenez
Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.092

6.  Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Sara E Nichols; Paul M Gasper; Vincent T Metzger; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Aaron M Ring; Aashish Manglik; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Harald Hübner; Els Pardon; Celine Valant; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Christian C Felder; Peter Gmeiner; Jan Steyaert; William I Weis; K Christopher Garcia; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.