Literature DB >> 9415513

Determinants of pressure pain threshold in adult twins: evidence that shared environmental influences predominate.

Alexander J MacGregor1, Gareth O Griffiths, Juliet Baker, Timothy D Spector.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors in determining pain perception in a classical twin study. Dolorimeter measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded in 609 healthy female-female twin pairs of whom 269 pairs were monozygotic (MZ) and 340 were dizygotic (DZ). There was a strong correlation (R) in PPT in both MZ and DZ pairs (R(MZ) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.49, 0.65]; R(DZ) = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.42, 0.59]). The slight excess in intraclass correlation observed in MZ when compared with DZ twins corresponds to a heritability for PPT of only 10% and is not statistically significant. Neither estimate of intraclass correlation was substantially altered after adjusting for a range of potential confounding variables including age, current tobacco and alcohol use, current analgesic use, psychological status assessed by the general health questionnaire, and social class. The dolorimeter measurements were shown to be reliable (between observer agreement R = 0.66; within observer agreement R = 0.70-0.76) and stable over time. In conclusion, these data suggest that there is no significant genetic contribution to the strong correlation in PPT that is observed in twin pairs. These findings reinforce the view that learned patterns of behaviour within families are an important determinant of perceived sensitivity to pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415513     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  15 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in pain responses.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Genetic predictors of acute and chronic pain.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

4.  TRPV1 expression level in isolectin B₄-positive neurons contributes to mouse strain difference in cutaneous thermal nociceptive sensitivity.

Authors:  Kentaro Ono; Yi Ye; Chi T Viet; Dongmin Dang; Brian L Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Clinical and evoked pain, personality traits, and emotional states: can familial confounding explain the associations?

Authors:  Eric Strachan; Brian Poeschla; Elizabeth Dansie; Annemarie Succop; Laura Chopko; Niloofar Afari
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition.

Authors:  J S Mogil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cold pressor pain sensitivity in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Philip M Ullrich; Niloofar Afari; Clemma Jacobsen; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Psychological and sensory predictors of experimental thermal pain: a multifactorial model.

Authors:  Christopher J Starr; Timothy T Houle; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 9.  Symbiotic relationship of pharmacogenetics and drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Joni L Rutter
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Genetic variation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis influences susceptibility to musculoskeletal pain: results from the EPIFUND study.

Authors:  Kate L Holliday; Barbara I Nicholl; Gary J Macfarlane; Wendy Thomson; Kelly A Davies; John McBeth
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.