Literature DB >> 9415502

Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a preliminary study.

Susmita Kashikar-Zuck1, Francis J Keefe, Phyllis Kornguth, Pat Beaupre, Amy Holzberg, David Delong.   

Abstract

This study examined how pain coping efficacy and pain coping strategies were related to reports of pain during mammography. Subjects were 125 women over the age of 50 undergoing screening mammograms. Prior to their mammogram, all subjects completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to assess how they cope with day-to-day pain experiences. Ratings of pain during the mammogram were collected using a 6-point pain/discomfort scale, a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale, the adjective checklist of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and the Brief Pain Inventory. Up to 93% of the women reported the mammogram examination was painful. On average, women rated the mammography pain in the low to moderate range. Considerable variability in pain ratings was found, however, with some women reporting severe pain and others reporting little or no pain. Correlational analyses were conducted to examine how coping efficacy (CSQ ratings of ability to decrease pain and ability to control pain) and coping strategies (CSQ pain coping strategy subscales) related to variations in pain report. There was a pattern for ratings of ability to decrease pain to be related to lower ratings of current mammography pain. Women who rated their ability to decrease pain as high reported lower average levels of mammography pain, lower ratings on the mammography pain/discomfort scale, and were much more likely to report having had lower levels of pain during their last mammogram. These findings suggest that women who rate their coping efficacy in decreasing day-to-day pain as low may be at higher risk for having a painful mammogram. Individual pain coping strategies were not generally correlated with pain ratings. Behavioral interventions (e.g., patient controlled breast compression) and cognitive therapy interventions (e.g., training in the use of calming self-statements or distraction techniques) designed to increase coping efficacy potentially could be useful in reducing pain in women who are at risk for pain during mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415502     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

2.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Hope in the context of lung cancer: relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress.

Authors:  David Berendes; Francis J Keefe; Tamara J Somers; Sejal M Kothadia; Laura S Porter; Jennifer S Cheavens
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Pain and discomfort associated with mammography among urban low-income African-American women.

Authors:  Mia A Papas; Ann C Klassen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-08

5.  Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; D Mortelmans; E Bruyninckx; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; E Van Hove; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Interaction of hope and optimism with anxiety and depression in a specific group of cancer survivors: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Rama K Rajandram; Samuel My Ho; Nabil Samman; Natalie Chan; Colman McGrath; Roger A Zwahlen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-11-28

7.  Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

Authors:  Jerry E de Groot; Mireille J M Broeders; Cornelis A Grimbergen; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Active pain coping is associated with the response in real-time fMRI neurofeedback during pain.

Authors:  Kirsten Emmert; Markus Breimhorst; Thomas Bauermann; Frank Birklein; Cora Rebhorn; Dimitri Van De Ville; Sven Haller
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.978

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.