Literature DB >> 9415366

Spatial limitation of vertical-size disparity processing.

H Kaneko1, I P Howard.   

Abstract

We investigated the upper limit of horizontal spatial modulation of vertical-size disparity in a textured surface for the perception of depth. In Experiment 1 subjects matched the appearance of a surface with modulated horizontal-size disparity to that of a surface with modulated vertical-size disparity. In Experiment 2 we determined the threshold amplitude of modulation of vertical-size disparity required for the perception of depth as a function of the spatial frequency of disparity modulation. The results indicate that sensations of depth are not elicited by modulations of vertical-size disparity of any amplitude at spatial frequencies higher than about 0.04 c/deg. We conclude that vertical disparities are averaged within about 20 deg-wide areas and suggest that this global measurement is used to scale local horizontal disparities for the perception of surface slant.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415366     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Learning to use an invisible visual signal for perception.

Authors:  Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Effect of vertical disparities on depth representation in macaque monkeys: MT physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Syed A Chowdhury; Daniel L Christiansen; Michael L Morgan; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A novel role for visual perspective cues in the neural computation of depth.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.