Literature DB >> 9413996

Inhibition of transpositional recombination by OrfA and OrfB proteins encoded by insertion sequence IS3.

Y Sekine1, K Izumi, T Mizuno, E Ohtsubo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An insertion element IS3 is flanked by terminal inverted repeat (IR) sequences. IS3 encodes two, out-of-phase, overlapping open reading frames, orfA and orfB, from which three proteins are produced. OrfAB is a transframe protein produced by -1 translational frameshifting between orfA and orfB, and it is known to be IS3 transposase. OrfA and OrfB are the proteins produced without frameshifting, but their functions have not been elucidated.
RESULTS: A plasmid carrying an IS3 mutant that produces only transposase generates miniplasmids--which are the IS3-mediated intramolecular transposition products--as well as characteristic IS3 circles and linear IS3 molecules. OrfA inhibited the generation of these small molecules to a lesser degree, but OrfB did not. OrfB, together with OrfA, however, inhibited the generation more strongly than OrfA alone. OrfA also inhibited the intermolecular transposition of mini-IS3 with the chloramphenicol-resistance gene flanked by IRs to a reduced frequency, and OrfB together with OrfA inhibited it almost completely. OrfA and/or OrfB did not, however, repress transcription from the promoter in the left-terminal region preceding orfA.
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained above show that OrfA and OrfB are not repressors but are inhibitors of transpositional recombination promoted by transposase. OrfA with an alpha helix-turn-alpha helix DNA-binding motif may compete with transposase to bind to terminal IRs. OrfA, together with OrfB that has a DDE motif conserved in retroviral integrases, may inhibit the formation of an active transpososome consisting oftransposase, two terminal IRs and target DNA for the strand transfer reaction. IS3 with a limited size, 1258 bp in length, uses strategies of translational frameshifting and coupling to produce transposase as well as negative regulators to make its copies at a low level, which minimizes a deleterious effect of transposition on bacterial hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9413996     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1440342.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Cells        ISSN: 1356-9597            Impact factor:   1.891


  17 in total

1.  Involvement of H-NS in transpositional recombination mediated by IS1.

Authors:  Y Shiga; Y Sekine; Y Kano; E Ohtsubo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Escherichia coli insertion sequence IS150: transposition via circular and linear intermediates.

Authors:  Markus Haas; Bodo Rak
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Presence of a characteristic D-D-E motif in IS1 transposase.

Authors:  Shinya Ohta; Ken Tsuchida; Sunju Choi; Yasuhiko Sekine; Yasuyuki Shiga; Eiichi Ohtsubo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Transposition of IS1397 in the family Enterobacteriaceae and first characterization of ISKpn1, a new insertion sequence associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae palindromic units.

Authors:  C Wilde; S Bachellier; M Hofnung; J M Clément
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The interplay of mRNA stimulatory signals required for AUU-mediated initiation and programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting in decoding of transposable element IS911.

Authors:  Marie-Françoise Prère; Isabelle Canal; Norma M Wills; John F Atkins; Olivier Fayet
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Insertion sequence-excision enhancer removes transposable elements from bacterial genomes and induces various genomic deletions.

Authors:  Masahiro Kusumoto; Tadasuke Ooka; Yoshiaki Nishiya; Yoshitoshi Ogura; Takashi Saito; Yasuhiko Sekine; Taketoshi Iwata; Masato Akiba; Tetsuya Hayashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Transposition mechanism, molecular characterization and evolution of IS6110, the specific evolutionary marker of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

Authors:  Sarah Thabet; Nada Souissi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Structural and functional characterization of IS679 and IS66-family elements.

Authors:  C G Han; Y Shiga; T Tobe; C Sasakawa; E Ohtsubo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Genome instability mediates the loss of key traits by Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 during laboratory evolution.

Authors:  Brian A Renda; Aurko Dasgupta; Dacia Leon; Jeffrey E Barrick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Transposition of cyanobacterium insertion element ISY100 in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Akihiro Urasaki; Yasuhiko Sekine; Eiichi Ohtsubo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.