Literature DB >> 9413967

Differentiation between benign and metastatic cervical lymph nodes with ultrasound.

Y Toriyabe1, T Nishimura, S Kita, Y Saito, N Miyokawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The differentiation between benign and metastatic lymph nodes with ultrasound (US) is based primarily on the evaluation of size, shape, margin and internal echo structure. The aim of this study is to determine whether these parameters are reliable indicators and to correlate internal echo structure and histopathological findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one nodes in 21 patients with pathologically proven oral squamous cell carcinoma were examined. The shortest diameter, the short/long diameter ratio (S/L ratio), margins and internal echo structure of the lymph node were evaluated by US. The internal echo structure was divided into six patterns: homogeneous hypoechoic, homogeneous hyperechoic, heterogeneous, eccentric hyperechoic, centric hyperechoic and anechoic pattern. In addition, internal echo structure was correlated with histopathological findings.
RESULTS: In 71.4% of the metastatic nodes, the shortest diameter was more than 10 mm and the S/L ratio was higher than that of benign nodes (average 0.71). Eleven (84.6%) of the 13 lymph nodes with irregular margins were metastatic. Heterogeneous and anechoic patterns were observed in metastatic nodes, whereas homogeneous hypoechoic and eccentric hyperechoic patterns were present in benign nodes. On ultrasonography with the corresponding histopathological findings, echogenic areas in the homogeneous hyperechoic, heterogeneous and centric hyperechoic patterns of metastatic nodes proved to be necrosis or fibrosis. Eccentric hyperechoic areas in benign nodes corresponded to the hilus and surrounding fatty tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: The shortest diameter, S/L ratio, margin and internal echo structure were considered to be critical indicators to differentiate between benign and metastatic nodes. Secondary changes caused by tumour infiltration, necrosis, or fibrosis should be assessed when metastatic lymph nodes are differentiated from benign ones by internal echo structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9413967     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80226-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Applications and Potential Developments of Ultrasound in Oral Cancer Management.

Authors:  Wu-Chia Lo; Chih-Ming Chang; Ping-Chia Cheng; Ming-Hsun Wen; Chi-Te Wang; Po-Wen Cheng; Li-Jen Liao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

2.  Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer.

Authors:  Uche-Albert Okeke; Sunday-Olusegun Ajike; Birch-Dauda Saheeb; Joseph-Bako Igashi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07

3.  Direct delivery of a cytotoxic anticancer agent into the metastatic lymph node using nano/microbubbles and ultrasound.

Authors:  Takuma Sato; Shiro Mori; Maya Sakamoto; Yoichi Arai; Tetsuya Kodama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ultrasonographic Appearances of Cervical Lymph Nodes in Healthy Turkish Adults Subpopulation: Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Özlem Okumuş; Merve Dönmez; Filiz N Pekiner
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-06-30

5.  Assessment of efficacy of ultrasonography in cervical lymphadenopathy in oral malignancies.

Authors:  Samruddhi Swapnil Metha; Amit Anil Mhapuskar; Swati P Marathe; Swapnil Suresh Metha; Santosh Jadhav; Shweta D Thakare; Deepak Passi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

6.  Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Namitha Jayapal; Shashi Kiran Mohan Ram; Vidya Sreenivasa Murthy; Sulphi A Basheer; Shaheen V Shamsuddin; Anas Bismillah Khan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

7.  Evaluation of reliability of ultrasonographic parameters in differentiating benign and metastatic cervical group of lymph nodes.

Authors:  Chintamaneni Raja Lakshmi; M Sudhakara Rao; A Ravikiran; Sivan Sathish; Sujana Mulk Bhavana
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.