Literature DB >> 9412633

Comparison of hemodynamic cerebral ischemia and microembolic signals detected during carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty.

F Crawley1, A Clifton, T Buckenham, T Loosemore, R S Taylor, M M Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There has been concern about carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) carrying a greater risk of cerebral ischemia than carotid endarterectomy. We set out to compare cerebral hemodynamics and microembolization during carotid PTA and CEA.
METHODS: We used transcranial Doppler to monitor the middle cerebral artery of 28 patients undergoing carotid PTA (n = 14) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with a shunt (n = 14). Each period during which the internal carotid artery was occluded by PTA balloon or by clamp when the shunt was not in place was timed. Individual periods were summated to give a total occlusion time. Ischemic time was defined as the period for which mean middle cerebral artery velocity fell to a third or less of baseline. Microembolic signals were counted during each procedure.
RESULTS: CEA resulted in significantly longer individual and total occlusion time than PTA (mean individual occlusion time, seconds), CEA, 168 +/- 51; PTA, 20 +/- 7; P < .001; mean total occlusion time; CEA, 337 +/- 70; PTA, 26 +/- 10; P < .001. Ischemic time was also significantly longer during CEA than during PTA (CEA, 165 +/- 40; PTA, 17 +/- 5; P = .001). There were significantly more microembolic signals during PTA than during CEA (mean number of microembolic signals during CEA, 52 +/- 64; during PTA, 202 +/- 119; P = .001). There was no correlation between any of the parameters measured and periprocedural stroke, which occurred in one patient in each group.
CONCLUSION: PTA results in less hemodynamic ischemia but more cerebral microembolism than CEA. In this small series, however, it is not possible to comment on the relations between ischemic time, microembolism, and stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9412633     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Proximal protection systems using carotid artery stent].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; U Dorenbeck; C Axmann; C Roth; T Struffert; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of Carotid Artery Plaque Using IVUS Virtual Histology.

Authors:  N Tamakawa; H Sakai; Y Nishimura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Silent ischemia after neuroprotected percutaneous carotid stenting: a diffusion-weighted MRI study.

Authors:  P Piñero; A González; A Mayol; E Martínez; J R González-Marcos; F Boza; A Cayuela; A Gil-Peralta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Holger Poppert; Oliver Wolf; Markus Resch; Wolfram Theiss; Till Schmidt-Thieme; Helga Graefin von Einsiedel; Peter Heider; Stefan Martinoff; Dirk Sander
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The use of intraoperative monitoring and treatment of symptomatic microemboli in carotid artery stenting: case report and discussion.

Authors:  P S Rangi; H S Markus; M N M Punter; A Clifton
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Embolic Complications of Endovascular Surgery for Cerebrovascular Diseases. Evaluation with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.

Authors:  H Sakai; N Sakai; I Nakahara; T Shimozuru; T Higashi; J C Takahashi; H Ohta; J Kokuzawa; H Manaka; A Morizane; Y Kawabata; I Nagata; H Kikuchi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Carotid stenting with the use of wallstent.

Authors:  A Ishii; K Mitsudo; K Kikuta; Y Arakawa; M Hojo; Y Goto; Y Ueno; S Yamagata
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark H Wholey; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Neuropsychological sequelae of carotid angioplasty with stent placement: correlation with ischemic lesions in diffusion weighted imaging.

Authors:  Laura Tiemann; Jutta Hubertina Reidt; Lorena Esposito; Dirk Sander; Wolfram Theiss; Holger Poppert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neuropsychological consequences of endarterectomy and endovascular angioplasty with stent placement for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Karsten Witt; Katharina Börsch; Christine Daniels; Knut Walluscheck; Karsten Alfke; Olav Jansen; Norbert Czech; Günther Deuschl; Robert Stingele
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 6.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.