Literature DB >> 9411380

United States vaccine research: a delicate fabric of public and private collaboration. National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

.   

Abstract

In the last 20 years, two thirds of all new vaccines provided worldwide have been produced by a US network of independent industrial, governmental, and academic partners engaged in vaccine research and development. Vaccines are complex products and the science of vaccinology is difficult. To achieve the full promise of modern science and technology to prevent and treat disease by immunization, the delicate fabric of America's cooperative and collaborative vaccine research relationships must be sustained and strengthened. The major partners are the federal government; four large companies--two US-headquartered (Wyeth-Lederle Biologics and Vaccines and Merck & Co), two foreign firms (SmithKline Beecham and Pasteur Mérieux Connaught); and academia. Of the $1.4 billion that fund US vaccine research and development annually, 46% comes from vaccine sales, 36% from taxpayers, and 18% from risk capital. Vaccine innovation could be strengthened by improved public and policy maker understanding of the vaccine development network; declarations of partnership; interactive dialog with federal advisory bodies; public forums for government and industry to listen to patients, providers and researchers; sabbatical assignments between partners; mechanisms to share industries' market research with public immunization programs; continued active industry participation in the Advisory committee on Immunization Practices and the National Vaccine Advisory committee; increased collaboration between industry and the National Institutes of Health for clinical research; harmonization of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices vaccine recommendations and the Food and Drug Administration package inserts; and public policies to foster the partnership's collaboration and robustness. The optimal size and configuration of the US vaccine enterprise should be debated only in the context of a full understanding of how the current system works and its record of effectiveness. These National Vaccine Advisory Committee recommendations are directed at developing public policies to foster and sustain vaccine innovation and ensure the timely introduction and supply of new vaccines needed by this nation and the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9411380     DOI: 10.1542/peds.100.6.1015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  4 in total

Review 1.  Performance of the United States Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP): 1988-2019.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Walter A Orenstein; Alan R Hinman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  The National Vaccine Advisory Committee at 30: Impact and opportunity.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Bruce G Gellin; Alan R Hinman; Walter A Orenstein
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  An opportunity to incentivize innovation to increase vaccine safety in the United States by improving vaccine delivery using vaccine patches.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Walter A Orenstein; Alan R Hinman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Who funded the research behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine?

Authors:  Sabrina Wimmer; Sarai Keestra; Samuel Cross; Yeanuk Rho; Henna Reddy; Toby Pepperrell; Florence Rodgers; Rhiannon Osborne; Ayolola Eni-Olotu; Rishi Banerjee
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.