Literature DB >> 9409293

The impact of atherosclerotic arterial remodeling on percentage of luminal stenosis varies widely within the arterial system. A postmortem study.

G Pasterkamp1, A H Schoneveld, W van Wolferen, B Hillen, R J Clarijs, C C Haudenschild, C Borst.   

Abstract

Luminal stenosis can be based on large atherosclerotic plaques in compensatory enlarged segments or on relatively little plaques in shrunken segments. In the present study, the contribution of plaque formation and remodeling to luminal narrowing was compared among six types of arteries prone to symptomatic atherosclerosis. Cross-sections (n = 5195) were obtained at regular intervals from 329 arteries. For each artery, the cross-section that contained the least amount of plaque was considered to be the reference. For each cross-section, the percentage of lumen area decrease was expressed as a percentage of the lumen area at the reference site (luminal stenosis). Similarly, the area encompassed by the internal elastic lamina (IEL area) was expressed as a percentage of the IEL area at the reference site (relative IEL area). All cross-sections were categorized in three groups: relative IEL area > 105% (enlargement), 95% to 105% (no remodeling), and < 95% (shrinkage). The prevalence of enlargement (50% to 75%) was significantly higher compared with shrinkage (8% to 25%). Shrinkage was observed most frequently in the femoral arteries (25%) and infrequently in the renal arteries (8%). For all types of arteries, the relative IEL area correlated negatively with luminal stenosis (P < .001). Regression analysis of relative IEL area on luminal stenosis, however, showed significant differences in the first-order regression coefficients among artery types. On average, plaque increase was more compensated for by enlargement in the coronary, common carotid, and renal arteries compared with the arteries obtained from the lower extremities. Anatomic regional differences were observed in the impact of arterial wall remodeling on percent luminal stenosis in de novo atherosclerotic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9409293     DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.17.11.3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol        ISSN: 1079-5642            Impact factor:   8.311


  31 in total

1.  Use of carotid intima-media thickness regression to guide therapy and management of cardiac risks.

Authors:  P Costanzo; J G Cleland; S L Atkin; E Vassallo; P Perrone-Filardi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-02

2.  Predictors of carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression as measured by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Saam; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Norihide Takaya; Hunter Underhill; Jianming Cai; Nam Tran; Nayak L Polissar; Blazej Neradilek; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Gwenn A Garden; Kenneth R Maravilla; Beverly Hashimoto; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Association between brachial artery reactivity and cardiovascular disease status in an elderly cohort: the cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  Joseph Yeboah; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Mary Ann Mcburnie; Gregory L Burke; David M Herrington; John R Crouse
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Association of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with abdominal aortic aneurysm: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Lu Yao; Aaron R Folsom; Alvaro Alonso; Pamela L Lutsey; James S Pankow; Weihua Guan; Susan Cheng; Frank A Lederle; Weihong Tang
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Histopathological Differences Between the Anterior and Posterior Brain Arteries as a Function of Aging.

Authors:  William Roth; Susan Morgello; James Goldman; Jay P Mohr; Mitchell S V Elkind; Randolph S Marshall; Jose Gutierrez
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Impact of vessel wall lesions and vascular stenoses on cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with intracranial stenotic disease.

Authors:  Petrice M Cogswell; Taylor L Davis; Megan K Strother; Carlos C Faraco; Allison O Scott; Lori C Jordan; Matthew R Fusco; Blaise deB Frederick; Jeroen Hendrikse; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Determinants of cerebrovascular remodeling: do large brain arteries accommodate stenosis?

Authors:  Jose Gutierrez; James Goldman; Lawrence S Honig; Mitchell S V Elkind; Susan Morgello; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  A robust rabbit model of human atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis.

Authors:  Alkystis Phinikaridou; Kevin J Hallock; Ye Qiao; James A Hamilton
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.922

9.  The contribution of HIV infection to intracranial arterial remodeling: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jose Gutierrez; Mitchell S V Elkind; Carol Petito; David Y Chung; Andrew J Dwork; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 1.906

10.  Association of plaque composition and vessel remodeling in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a comparison with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kataoka; Verghese Mathew; Ronen Rubinshtein; Charanjit S Rihal; Ryan Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.