Literature DB >> 9409098

A Canadian survey of issues in cancer pain management.

N MacDonald1, H P Findlay, E Bruera, D Dudgeon, J Kramer.   

Abstract

We report the analysis of a cancer management survey mailed to a representative group of health professionals in 1994. The goals of the study were to gather information on cancer pain treatment practices, and to obtain health professional views on obstacles to ideal pain management. The survey, designed by a working party of pharmacists, nurses and physicians, was distributed to 14,628 physicians. A total of 2,686 physicians responded to the survey, including 39% of medical or radiation oncologists, and 18.19% of physicians who listed their primary interest as Family Medicine. Reflecting the modest emphasis placed on palliative care and cancer pain management in the current Canadian milieu, 67% of physicians rated their past teaching experience as only "fair" or "poor." Lack of exposure to pain education was reflected in the response to a series of hypothetical case scenarios exploring physician choices in managing severe cancer pain. For example, in the initial management of a cancer patient with severe pain, 50% of physicians would not use a strong opioid in the absence of other contraindications to opioid use. A wide variety of analgesics and non-pharmacologic techniques is available to Canadian physicians to assist patients with pain. Few physicians identified the unavailability of analgesics or analgesic techniques as limiting factors in pain management. We conclude that greater emphasis should be placed on pain education in our training programmes. We suggest that further surveys of this type, sponsored by our provincial colleges and medical organizations, can provide feedback which will enhance the adherence by Canadian physicians to published guidelines for pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9409098     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  9 in total

1.  Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Program: impact on patterns of terminal cancer care.

Authors:  E Bruera; C M Neumann; B Gagnon; C Brenneis; P Kneisler; P Selmser; J Hanson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Cancer pain--progress and ongoing issues in Canada.

Authors:  Sharon Watanabe; Yoko Tarumi
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  A march of folly.

Authors:  N MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Palliative care--an essential component of cancer control.

Authors:  N MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Bioethics for clinicians: 15. Quality end-of-life care.

Authors:  P A Singer; N MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Enhancing family physician capacity to deliver quality palliative home care: an end-of-life, shared-care model.

Authors:  Denise Marshall; Doris Howell; Kevin Brazil; Michelle Howard; Alan Taniguchi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Awareness and use of the Rapid Palliative Radiotherapy Program by family physicians in Eastern Ontario: a survey.

Authors:  E J Fitzgibbon; R Samant; J Meng; I D Graham
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Assessment of Adequacy of Pain Management and Analgesic Use in Patients With Advanced Cancer Using the Brief Pain Inventory and Pain Management Index Calculation.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Raja Paramjeet Singh Banipal; Baltej Singh
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 9.  Evidence and consensus recommendations for the pharmacological management of pain in India.

Authors:  Gur Prasad Dureja; Rajagopalan N Iyer; Gautam Das; Jaishid Ahdal; Prashant Narang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.