Literature DB >> 9408793

Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom.

S B Fawcett1, R K Lewis, A Paine-Andrews, V T Francisco, K P Richter, E L Williams, B Copple.   

Abstract

In the United States alone, there are more than 2,000 community coalitions to address local concerns about abuse of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. This article describes an evaluation system used to examine the process, outcome, and impact of coalitions for the prevention of substance abuse. The evaluation addresses five key questions: (a) Was the community mobilized to address substance abuse (Process)? (b) What changes in the community resulted from the coalition (Outcome)? (c) Is there a change in reported use of alcohol and other substances by youths (Outcome)? (d) Does the coalition have a community-level impact on substance abuse (Impact)? and (e) Is community-level impact related to changes facilitated by the coalition (Impact)? To address these and other questions, using eight core measurement instruments, the evaluation system collects 15 distinct measures. This evaluation system is illustrated with a multiyear study of Project Freedom, a substance abuse coalition in a large midwestern city.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408793     DOI: 10.1177/109019819702400614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  16 in total

1.  The spectrum of prevention: developing a comprehensive approach to injury prevention.

Authors:  L Cohen; S Swift
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  The effect of neighborhood-based community organizing: results from the Seattle Minority Youth Health Project.

Authors:  A Cheadle; E Wagner; M Walls; P Diehr; M Bell; C Anderman; C McBride; R F Catalano; E Pettigrew; R Simmons; H Neckerman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A model memorandum of collaboration: a proposal.

Authors:  S B Fawcett; V T Francisco; A Paine-Andrews; J A Schultz
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.

Authors:  Cheryl Merzel; Joanna D'Afflitti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluation findings from the Institute for Public Health and Faith Collaborations.

Authors:  Michelle Crozier Kegler; Mimi Kiser; Sarah M Hall
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Conceptualizing a Public Health Prevention Intervention for Bridging the 30 Million Word Gap.

Authors:  Charles R Greenwood; Judith J Carta; Dale Walker; Jomella Watson-Thompson; Jill Gilkerson; Anne L Larson; Alana Schnitz
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-03

7.  What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?

Authors:  Rebecca Wells; Ann J Ward; Mark Feinberg; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-09

8.  Policy and system change and community coalitions: outcomes from allies against asthma.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Laurie Lachance; Linda Jo Doctor; Lisa Gilmore; Cindy Kelly; James Krieger; Marielena Lara; John Meurer; Amy Friedman Milanovich; Elisa Nicholas; Michael Rosenthal; Shelley C Stoll; Margaret Wilkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Advancing coalition theory: the effect of coalition factors on community capacity mediated by member engagement.

Authors:  Michelle C Kegler; Deanne W Swan
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-09-12

10.  Reducing cancer disparities through community engagement in policy development: the role of cancer councils.

Authors:  Michael A Preston; Glen P Mays; Rise' D Jones; Sharla A Smith; Chara N Stewart; Ronda S Henry-Tillman
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.