Literature DB >> 9408725

Informed consent: protection or obstacle? Some emerging issues.

S S Ellenberg1.   

Abstract

There is widespread consensus on the need for informed consent procedures in medical research. Nevertheless, aspects of the informed consent process remain controversial, and innovative approaches to research may raise new issues and concerns. The randomized consent design for clinical trials, proposed by Zelen (N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1242-1245), permitted physicians to randomize patients without consent, then obtain informed consent from only those patients randomized to the experimental (as opposed to the standard treatment) arm. More recently, the proposal has been made to allow waiver of informed consent for study of patients in emergency circumstances who may be temporarily incapable of providing such consent, and for whom no family member is immediately available to give a "proxy" consent (Biros M.H. et al. JAMA 1995; 273:1283-1287). The medical community and federal regulatory policy have responded differently to these proposals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408725     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00130-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  9 in total

1.  Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.

Authors:  Scott Yh Kim; James Flory; Clare Relton
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Motivation and frustration in cardiology trial participation: the patient perspective.

Authors:  Silmara Meneguin; Luiz Antônio Machado Cesar
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?

Authors:  David T Huang; Mehrnaz Hadian
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Parenteral nutrition at the palliative phase of advanced cancer: the ALIM-K study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lionel Pazart; Elodie Cretin; Ghislain Grodard; Cecile Cornet; Florence Mathieu-Nicot; Franck Bonnetain; Mariette Mercier; Patrice Cuynet; Carole Bouleuc; Regis Aubry
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.

Authors:  Susanne Rebers; Neil K Aaronson; Flora E van Leeuwen; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim Thestrup Foss; Jesper Kjærgaard; Lone Graff Stensballe; Gorm Greisen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Ethical tensions in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric and newborn care in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Dan K Kaye; Gershom Chongwe; Nelson K Sewankambo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views.

Authors:  Jan Lecouturier; Helen Rodgers; Gary A Ford; Tim Rapley; Lynne Stobbart; Stephen J Louw; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life of Parenteral Nutrition for Patients with Advanced Cancer Cachexia: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carole Bouleuc; Amélie Anota; Cécile Cornet; Ghislain Grodard; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin; Olivier Dubroeucq; Nathalie Crétineau; Véronique Frasie; Vincent Gamblin; Gisèle Chvetzoff; Laure Favier; Christophe Tournigand; Marie-Christine Grach; Bruno Raynard; Sébastien Salas; Géraldine Capodano; Lionel Pazart; Régis Aubry
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-03-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.