Literature DB >> 9408721

Meta-analysis of randomized trials: looking back and looking ahead.

S Yusuf1.   

Abstract

Meta-analyses as currently practiced are usually retrospective. They can be made more rigorous by developing a protocol that incorporates prospectively the elements that are usually necessary in a well-designed trial. Meta-analysis and large trials are complementary. Meta-analysis of small trials is useful in generating the hypotheses and assisting in the design of the large trials that are needed. Once the large trials have been completed, they could be brought together within the framework of a meta-analysis to estimate the overall treatment effect with greater confidence and to explore the effects in various subgroups. This article explores the value and limitations of meta-analyses and suggests ways of improving their conduct and interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408721     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  4 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aminu Bello; Ben Vandermeer; Natasha Wiebe; Amit X Garg; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mufiza Farid-Kapadia; Kariym C Joachim; Chrinna Balasingham; April Clyburne-Sherin; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06

3.  Pouch Roux-en-Y vs No Pouch Roux-en-Y following total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 12 studies.

Authors:  Liang Zong; Ping Chen; Yinbing Chen; Guohao Shi
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-03

4.  The surgical treatment for portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lanning Yin; Haipeng Liu; Youcheng Zhang; Wen Rong
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.