PURPOSE: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of serum lipids and lipoproteins with oral contraceptive (OC) use were examined among white and black women aged 18-27 years in 1985-86 and 1988-1991 in the Bogalusa Heart Study, a study of cardiovascular disease in a Southern community. METHODS: Analyses of covariance. RESULTS: In 1985-1986, white OC users had significantly (p < 0.05) higher adjusted mean total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterols, and lower high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol compared with nonusers; black OC users had higher triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, and lower HDL cholesterol. In 1988-1991, white OC users had higher total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, while black OC users had higher triglycerides. OC use was unrelated to mean HDL cholesterol levels in 1988-1991; however, a lower percentage of white OC users than nonusers in 1988-1991 had HDL cholesterol levels < 35 mg/dl. Longitudinally, white OC nonusers at baseline who used OCs at follow-up had significant increases from baseline levels in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL cholesterols; black women showed an increase only in LDL cholesterol. White women who stopped using OCs by follow-up had a decrease in VLDL and LDL cholesterols, and an increase in HDL cholesterol. White OC users at both exams also had a significant increase in HDL cholesterol, whereas women who began using OCs by follow-up did not. CONCLUSIONS: The unfavorable lipid profile associated with OC use was not apparent upon discontinued use. Lack of an adverse effect of OC use on HDL cholesterol at follow-up may be the result of changing formulations, and requires further examination.
PURPOSE: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of serum lipids and lipoproteins with oral contraceptive (OC) use were examined among white and black women aged 18-27 years in 1985-86 and 1988-1991 in the Bogalusa Heart Study, a study of cardiovascular disease in a Southern community. METHODS: Analyses of covariance. RESULTS: In 1985-1986, white OC users had significantly (p < 0.05) higher adjusted mean total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterols, and lower high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol compared with nonusers; black OC users had higher triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, and lower HDL cholesterol. In 1988-1991, white OC users had higher total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, while black OC users had higher triglycerides. OC use was unrelated to mean HDL cholesterol levels in 1988-1991; however, a lower percentage of white OC users than nonusers in 1988-1991 had HDL cholesterol levels < 35 mg/dl. Longitudinally, white OC nonusers at baseline who used OCs at follow-up had significant increases from baseline levels in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL cholesterols; black women showed an increase only in LDL cholesterol. White women who stopped using OCs by follow-up had a decrease in VLDL and LDL cholesterols, and an increase in HDL cholesterol. White OC users at both exams also had a significant increase in HDL cholesterol, whereas women who began using OCs by follow-up did not. CONCLUSIONS: The unfavorable lipid profile associated with OC use was not apparent upon discontinued use. Lack of an adverse effect of OC use on HDL cholesterol at follow-up may be the result of changing formulations, and requires further examination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Americas; Biology; Blacks; Cholesterol; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Correlation Studies; Cultural Background; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Ethnic Groups; Family Planning; Lipid Metabolic Effects; Lipids; Longitudinal Studies; Louisiana; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--side effects; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Statistical Studies; Studies; United States; Whites
Authors: Erica P Gunderson; Rachel A Whitmer; Cora E Lewis; Charles P Quesenberry; Delia Smith West; Stephen Sidney Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Marsha E Samson; Swann A Adams; Anwar T Merchant; Whitney D Maxwell; Jiajia Zhang; Charles L Bennett; James R Hebert Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Jessica L Castilho; Cathy A Jenkins; Bryan E Shepherd; Sally S Bebawy; Megan Turner; Timothy R Sterling; Vlada V Melekhin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Erica P Gunderson; Cora E Lewis; Maureen A Murtaugh; Charles P Quesenberry; Delia Smith West; Stephen Sidney Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897