E J Mlinek1, J Pierce. 1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Omaha, NE, USA. emlinek@mail.unmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of visual and auditory confidentiality and privacy breaches in a university ED. METHODS: A prospective, observational study of medical personnel behavior was performed using participant and direct observation techniques. Observations were made in a university tertiary referral and trauma center emergency facility. Observers recorded auditory and visual confidentiality and privacy breaches in various patient care areas during 1-hour periods. Information collected included patient name or room number, complaint/diagnosis, diagnostic tests, past medical history, and personal information. It was then determined whether a clear identification of the patient's name or face and/or an association to his or her clinical course could be made. RESULTS: All members of the health care team committed confidentiality and privacy breaches. Frequency of breaches was dependent on room location and design. Breaches in the triage/waiting area occurred for > 53% of the patients. Breaches near the physician/nursing station ranged from 3 to 24 per hour and 1.5 to 3.4 per patient hour. Other inappropriate comments also were noted. One hundred consecutive patients and family members were interviewed at ED release, with only 2/100 having noticed the status board, although neither could recall any specific details. CONCLUSION: Confidentiality and privacy breaches occur in a university ED by all members of the health care team. The ED architecture and floor plan affect patient confidentiality and privacy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of visual and auditory confidentiality and privacy breaches in a university ED. METHODS: A prospective, observational study of medical personnel behavior was performed using participant and direct observation techniques. Observations were made in a university tertiary referral and trauma center emergency facility. Observers recorded auditory and visual confidentiality and privacy breaches in various patient care areas during 1-hour periods. Information collected included patient name or room number, complaint/diagnosis, diagnostic tests, past medical history, and personal information. It was then determined whether a clear identification of the patient's name or face and/or an association to his or her clinical course could be made. RESULTS: All members of the health care team committed confidentiality and privacy breaches. Frequency of breaches was dependent on room location and design. Breaches in the triage/waiting area occurred for > 53% of the patients. Breaches near the physician/nursing station ranged from 3 to 24 per hour and 1.5 to 3.4 per patient hour. Other inappropriate comments also were noted. One hundred consecutive patients and family members were interviewed at ED release, with only 2/100 having noticed the status board, although neither could recall any specific details. CONCLUSION: Confidentiality and privacy breaches occur in a university ED by all members of the health care team. The ED architecture and floor plan affect patient confidentiality and privacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; University of Nebraska Medical Center
Authors: Cristina M Beltran-Aroca; Eloy Girela-Lopez; Eliseo Collazo-Chao; Manuel Montero-Pérez-Barquero; Maria C Muñoz-Villanueva Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 2.652
Authors: John C Moskop; Catherine A Marco; Gregory Luke Larkin; Joel M Geiderman; Arthur R Derse Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Reema Karasneh; Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi; Sayer Al-Azzam; Sawsan Abuhammad; Suhaib M Muflih; Sahar Hawamdeh; Karem H Alzoubi Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2021-03-02