Literature DB >> 9407959

Mitosin (a new proliferation marker) correlates with clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer.

G M Clark1, D C Allred, S G Hilsenbeck, G C Chamness, C K Osborne, D Jones, W H Lee.   

Abstract

Tumor proliferation rate is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, and S-phase fraction (SPF), as measured by flow cytometry, is the most clinically validated of several methods for measuring it. However, flow cytometry is not well suited to evaluating the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors that are routinely available or to the increasing number of small breast cancers. These and other limitations have motivated research into alternative methods for measuring proliferation, including immunohistochemistry (IHC) against cell cycle-related antigens, which are better suited for the evaluation of small archival tissue samples. Mitosin is a recently described 350 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that is expressed in the late G1, S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle but not in G0. Using a new monoclonal antibody (14C10), this pilot study evaluated mitosin expression by IHC in a series of 386 node-negative, formalin-fixed, archival breast cancers and correlated the results with several prognostic factors and clinical outcome (median follow-up, 78 months; range 3-214 months). The median and range of mitosin positive cells were 7% and 1-47%, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between mitosin and SPF (r = 0.57; P = 0.0001), and there were significant negative correlations with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and patient age. Mitosin was not related to overall survival in this pilot study. However, in a univariate cutpoint analysis of disease-free survival (DFS), patients with high levels of mitosin (>9% positive cells) had significantly worse DFS than did patients with lower levels (68% versus 84% at 5 years, respectively). In a multivariate analysis of DFS, large tumor size (>2 cm) and high mitosin were the only independently significant predictors of recurrence (relative risks = 2.47 and 1.72, respectively) in a model containing the additional factors estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, patient age, and SPF. These preliminary results suggest that mitosin as assessed by IHC may be superior to SPF as a prognostic factor in node-negative breast cancer, but additional studies are necessary to validate these promising findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9407959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  15 in total

1.  CENP-F expression is associated with poor prognosis and chromosomal instability in patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Sallyann L O'Brien; Ailís Fagan; Edward J P Fox; Robert C Millikan; Aedín C Culhane; Donal J Brennan; Amanda H McCann; Shauna Hegarty; Siobhan Moyna; Michael J Duffy; Desmond G Higgins; Karin Jirström; Göran Landberg; William M Gallagher
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Unclassified renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological, comparative genomic hybridization, and whole-genome exon sequencing study.

Authors:  Zhen-Yan Hu; Li-Juan Pang; Yan Qi; Xue-Ling Kang; Jian-Ming Hu; Lianghai Wang; Kun-Peng Liu; Yuan Ren; Mei Cui; Li-Li Song; Hong-An Li; Hong Zou; Feng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

3.  Loss of CENPF leads to developmental failure in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Cheng-Jie Zhou; Xing-Yue Wang; Zhe Han; Dong-Hui Wang; Yu-Zhen Ma; Cheng-Guang Liang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Cenp-F (mitosin) is more than a mitotic marker.

Authors:  Asta Varis; Anna-Leena Salmela; Marko J Kallio
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Murine CENPF interacts with syntaxin 4 in the regulation of vesicular transport.

Authors:  Ryan D Pooley; Katherine L Moynihan; Victor Soukoulis; Samyukta Reddy; Richard Francis; Cecilia Lo; Li-Jun Ma; David M Bader
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Ki-67 expression is superior to mitotic count and novel proliferation markers PHH3, MCM4 and mitosin as a prognostic factor in thick cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Rita G Ladstein; Ingeborg M Bachmann; Oddbjørn Straume; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The microtubule binding properties of CENP-E's C-terminus and CENP-F.

Authors:  Vivek Musinipally; Stuart Howes; Gregory M Alushin; Eva Nogales
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Expression of centromere protein F (CENP-F) associated with higher FDG uptake on PET/CT, detected by cDNA microarray, predicts high-risk patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Nobuo Kondoh; Hitoshi Tsuda; Souhei Yamamoto; Hideki Asakawa; Kazuhiko Fukatsu; Takayuki Kobayashi; Junji Yamamoto; Katsumi Tamura; Jiro Ishida; Yoshiyuki Abe; Mikio Yamamoto; Hidetaka Mochizuki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Upregulation of CENP-H in tongue cancer correlates with poor prognosis and progression.

Authors:  Wen-Ting Liao; Chun-Ping Yu; Dong-Hui Wu; Ling Zhang; Li-Hua Xu; Gui-Xiang Weng; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Li-Bing Song; Jin-Song Li
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-05

10.  Prognostic relevance of Centromere protein H expression in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Guo; Ge Zhang; Jun-Ye Wang; Wan-Li Liu; Fang Wang; Ju-Qin Dong; Li-Hua Xu; Jing-Yan Cao; Li-Bing Song; Mu-Sheng Zeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.