Literature DB >> 9407932

Cervical cancer.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide physicians and the general public with a responsible assessment of current screening, prevention, and treatment approaches to cervical cancer. PARTICIPANTS: A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 13-member panel representing the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, gynecologic oncology, radiation oncology, and epidemiology. In addition, 28 experts in obstetrics and gynecology, gynecologic oncology, radiation oncology, gynecologic surgery, and psychology presented data to the panel and a conference audience of 500. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched through Medline and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference.
CONCLUSIONS: Carcinoma of the cervix is causally related to infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). Reducing the rate of HPV infection by changes in sexual behaviors in young people and/or through the development of an effective HPV vaccine would reduce the incidence of this disease. Pap smear screening remains the best available method of reducing the incidence and mortality of invasive cervical cancer. Persons with stage IA1 disease have a high cure rate with either simple hysterectomy or, where fertility preservation is an issue, by cone biopsy with clear margins. For patients with other stage I and stage IIA disease, radical surgery and radiation are equally effective treatments. These patients should be carefully selected to receive one treatment or the other but not both, as their combined use substantially increases the cost and morbidity of treatment. Women with more advanced, nonmetastatic disease should be treated with radiation. Recurrent cervical cancer confined to the pelvis should be treated with the modality not previously received. Radiation is recommended to palliate symptoms in patients with metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9407932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NIH Consens Statement        ISSN: 1080-1707


  28 in total

1.  Papanicolaou test use among reproductive-age women at high risk for cervical cancer: analyses of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Maria Hewitt; Susan Devesa; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Geographic poverty and racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer precursor rates in Connecticut, 2008-2009.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Pamela J Julian; Alyssa Bilinski; Niti R Mehta; James I Meek; Daniel Zelterman; James L Hadler; Lynn Sosa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Opportunities to improve cervical cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Community health worker intervention to decrease cervical cancer disparities in Hispanic women.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Rebecca Bixby; Susana Pimentel; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Human papillomavirus vaccine: a boon or curse.

Authors:  Sumit Chawla; Inderjeet Singh; Rambilas Jain; Bharti Mehta; Sneh Kumari; Soumya Swaroop Sahoo
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  E L Franco; E Duarte-Franco; A Ferenczy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Vaccination issues in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving immunosuppression.

Authors:  Seper Dezfoli; Gil Y Melmed
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-08

8.  Role of human papillomavirus in penile cancer, penile intraepithelial squamous cell neoplasias and in genital warts.

Authors:  G Gross; H Pfister
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The application of Kingdon's Multiple Streams Theory for human papillomavirus-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Tara Walhart
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  HIV women's health: a study of gynecological healthcare service utilization in a U.S. urban clinic population.

Authors:  Monique A Tello; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Jean M Keller; Mary C Beach; Jean R Anderson; Richard D Moore
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.