Literature DB >> 9407507

A quantitative analysis of sodium transport and removal during peritoneal dialysis.

T Wang1, J Waniewski, O Heimbürger, A Werynski, B Lindholm.   

Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate peritoneal sodium transport, the diffusive mass transport coefficient (KBD) and sieving coefficient (S), as well as the mass of sodium transported by diffusion (DM), by convection (CM) and by fluid absorption (AM) and the total sodium mass removed (RM) were calculated during a series of single dwell studies in CAPD patients. A six-hour dwell study was performed in 68 patients using 2 liter of 1.36% (N = 13), 2.27% (N = 9) or 3.86% (N = 46) glucose dialysis fluid with 131I-albumin as the intraperitoneal volume marker. The patients in whom the 3.86% glucose dialysis fluid was applied were further divided into four transport groups according to a modified peritoneal equilibration test: high (H), high-average (H-A), low-average (L-A), and low (L) transport. There was no significant difference in KBD nor in S for sodium among different solutions. However, the removed sodium mass (RM) was significantly higher in the 3.86% (70.5 +/- 31.5 mmol) and 2.27% (36.0 +/- 21.0 mmol) solutions as compared to that of the 1.36% (-1.8 +/- 26 mmol) solution mainly due to increased both CM and DM. In general, CM was twice as high as DM. AM substantially decreased sodium removal. Among the different transport groups, the KBD and S values for sodium were significantly higher in the H group as compared to the other transport groups (both P < 0.05). However, RM was significantly lower in the H group mainly due to higher AM. Using a 3.86% glucose solution, the D/P for sodium was found to be significantly different (but only after 120 min of the dwell) between all the different transport groups. In conclusion, sodium removal in CAPD is strongly related to the fluid removal. The ultrafiltration induced convective transport (CM) and peritoneal absorption of sodium (AM) were of similar magnitude and were twice as high as the diffusive transport (DM) and both play an important role in the peritoneal sodium balance. A D/P for sodium using the 3.86% glucose solution, especially at the end of the dwell, can be used to discriminate between different transport categories of patients. High transport patients have a poor fluid and sodium removal that are likely to affect their clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9407507     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1997.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  9 in total

1.  Sodium removal by peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Silvio Borrelli; Vincenzo La Milia; Luca De Nicola; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Roberto Russo; Michele Provenzano; Roberto Minutolo; Giuseppe Conte; Carlo Garofalo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Characterization of sodium removal to ultrafiltration volume in a peritoneal dialysis outpatient cohort.

Authors:  David A Jaques; Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-04-06

Review 3.  Should sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis be estimated from the ultrafiltration volume?

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Ariane Zaloszyc; Betti Schaefer; Claus Peter Schmitt
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Dissociation between the correlation of peritoneal and urine Kt/V with sodium and fluid removal: a possible explanation of their difference on patient survival.

Authors:  Xin-kui Tian; Tao Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Different treatment options in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Roy van den Berg; Trijntje T Cnossen; Constantijn J A M Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M L Leunissen
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

6.  Long Peritoneal Dialysis Dwells With Icodextrin: Kinetics of Transperitoneal Fluid and Polyglucose Transport.

Authors:  Anna Olszowska; Jacek Waniewski; Joanna Stachowska-Pietka; Elvia Garcia-Lopez; Bengt Lindholm; Zofia Wańkowicz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Volume-Independent Sodium Toxicity in Peritoneal Dialysis: New Insights from Bench to Bed.

Authors:  Silvio Borrelli; Luca De Nicola; Ilaria De Gregorio; Lucio Polese; Luigi Pennino; Claudia Elefante; Alessandro Carbone; Tiziana Rappa; Roberto Minutolo; Carlo Garofalo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Peritoneal function in clinical practice: the importance of follow-up and its measurement in patients. Recommendations for patient information and measurement of peritoneal function.

Authors:  Annemieke M Coester; Watske Smit; Dirk G Struijk; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2009-01-15

9.  The effects of low-sodium peritoneal dialysis fluids on blood pressure, thirst and volume status.

Authors:  Simon Davies; Ola Carlsson; Ole Simonsen; Ann-Cathrine Johansson; Daniele Venturoli; Ingrid Ledebo; Anders Wieslander; Cian Chan; Bengt Rippe
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.