Literature DB >> 9407406

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.

J S Hermann1, D L Cochran, P V Nummikoski, D Buser.   

Abstract

Current implant placement utilizes both nonsubmerged and submerged techniques. However, the implications of the location of a rough/smooth implant interface as well as the location of a microgap between implant and abutment on crestal bone changes are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate crestal bone changes around unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged titanium implants in a side-by-side comparison. Fifty-nine (59) implants were placed at different levels to the alveolar crest in 5 foxhounds. Standardized radiographs were taken at baseline and at monthly intervals until sacrifice at 6 months. Radiographic assessment was carried out by measuring the distance between the top of the implant/abutment and the most coronal bone-to-implant contact (DIB), and by evaluation of bone density changes using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). DIB measurements revealed that in 1-part, nonsubmerged implants, the most coronal bone-to-implant contact followed at all time points the rough/smooth implant interface. In all 2-part implants, nonsubmerged and submerged, the most coronal bone-to-implant contact was consistently located approximately 2 mm below the microgap. In addition, CADIA values for all 2-part implants were decreased in the most coronal area-of-interest (AOI). All bone changes were statistically significant and detectable 1 month after implant placement in nonsubmerged implants or 1 month after abutment connection in submerged implants. Neither implant position nor individual dog effects were statistically significant. These results demonstrate that the rough/smooth implant interface as well as the location of the microgap have a significant effect on marginal bone formation as evaluated by standardized longitudinal radiography. Bone remodeling occurs rapidly during the early healing phase after implant placement for non-submerged implants and after abutment connection for submerged implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9407406     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.11.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  36 in total

1.  Assessment of lipopolysaccharide microleakage at conical implant-abutment connections.

Authors:  Sönke Harder; Elgar Susanne Quabius; Lars Ossenkop; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Marginal bony changes in relation to different vertical positions of dental implants.

Authors:  Jung-Myung Yi; Jae-Kwan Lee; Heung-Sik Um; Beom-Seok Chang; Min-Ku Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  A focus on soft tissue in dental implantology.

Authors:  B S Talwar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-15

4.  Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Alessandra Lucchese; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-02-19

5.  Radiological evaluation of the Cresco system in combination with Osseospeed implants: a preliminary 3-year report.

Authors:  N Baldini; M DE Sanctis; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; F Vignoletti; C Goracci; M Ferrari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

6.  New technique for inter-implant papilla reconstruction between two or more implants in patients with variably reabsorbed ridges and flat anatomy. Preliminary results of a 9 consecutive clinical case series.

Authors:  R Tizzoni; M Tizzoni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-19

7.  Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the Dental Tech Implant System: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Massimo Del Fabbro; Carlo Bianchessi; Riccardo Del Lupo; Luca Landi; Silvio Taschieri; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Effect of different localizations of microgap on clinical parameters and inflammatory cytokines in peri-implant crevicular fluid: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Duygu Boynueğri; Mehmet Yalim; Seçil Karakoca Nemli; B Imge Ergüder; Pelin Gökalp
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.