BACKGROUND: Antibodies preferentially can direct radionuclides to solid tumors. However, antibody uptake in tumors is often highly heterogeneous. This heterogeneity may be overcome by increasing antibody protein dose. METHODS: The biodistribution of increasing protein doses of radioiodinated antirenal cell carcinoma (RCC) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) G250 and RC 38 was studied in mice with NU-12 or SK-RC-52 RCC xenografts. In addition, MoAb affinity constants and antigen densities (Scatchard analysis) and MoAb processing (internalization) were determined in vitro. RESULTS: The relative uptake of G250 in NU-12 tumors was very high at low protein doses (125% injected dose/g [%ID/g]), but decreased at higher doses, suggesting tumor saturation. Indeed, saturation of G250 antigen occurred at 3 microg protein. In this model, 9200 G250 determinants per NU-12 cell could be targeted, which is only 6.1% of the 150,000 G250 determinants per NU-12 cell as determined in vitro. The RC 38 uptake in NU-12 tumors remained constant up to the 10 microg dose level (40% ID/g) and decreased at higher doses. RC 38 antigens were saturated at 25 microg of RC 38. With RC 38, 15% of the available RC 38 antigens per NU-12 tumor cell were targeted. In contrast, G250 uptake in SK-RC-52 tumors was very low at low antibody dose (4% ID/g at 1 microg) and increased with increasing protein dose. These differences in G250 biodistribution might be related to differences in the processing of G250 by the tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies show that some RCC tumors can be saturated with anti-RCC MoAbs at low (25 microg) to very low (3 microg) protein doses. At nonsaturated doses relatively high tumor uptake can be achieved. Surprisingly, in NU-12 tumors only 6.1% and 15% of the available antigenic sites were targeted at the saturating dose levels with G250 and RC 38, respectively.
BACKGROUND: Antibodies preferentially can direct radionuclides to solid tumors. However, antibody uptake in tumors is often highly heterogeneous. This heterogeneity may be overcome by increasing antibody protein dose. METHODS: The biodistribution of increasing protein doses of radioiodinated antirenal cell carcinoma (RCC) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) G250 and RC 38 was studied in mice with NU-12 or SK-RC-52 RCC xenografts. In addition, MoAb affinity constants and antigen densities (Scatchard analysis) and MoAb processing (internalization) were determined in vitro. RESULTS: The relative uptake of G250 in NU-12 tumors was very high at low protein doses (125% injected dose/g [%ID/g]), but decreased at higher doses, suggesting tumor saturation. Indeed, saturation of G250 antigen occurred at 3 microg protein. In this model, 9200 G250 determinants per NU-12 cell could be targeted, which is only 6.1% of the 150,000 G250 determinants per NU-12 cell as determined in vitro. The RC 38 uptake in NU-12 tumors remained constant up to the 10 microg dose level (40% ID/g) and decreased at higher doses. RC 38 antigens were saturated at 25 microg of RC 38. With RC 38, 15% of the available RC 38 antigens per NU-12tumor cell were targeted. In contrast, G250 uptake in SK-RC-52 tumors was very low at low antibody dose (4% ID/g at 1 microg) and increased with increasing protein dose. These differences in G250 biodistribution might be related to differences in the processing of G250 by the tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies show that some RCC tumors can be saturated with anti-RCC MoAbs at low (25 microg) to very low (3 microg) protein doses. At nonsaturated doses relatively high tumor uptake can be achieved. Surprisingly, in NU-12 tumors only 6.1% and 15% of the available antigenic sites were targeted at the saturating dose levels with G250 and RC 38, respectively.
Authors: Sarah M Cheal; Blesida Punzalan; Michael G Doran; Michael J Evans; Joseph R Osborne; Jason S Lewis; Pat Zanzonico; Steven M Larson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gursah Kats-Ugurlu; Egbert Oosterwijk; Stijn Muselaers; Jeannette Oosterwijk-Wakka; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Mirjam de Weijert; Han van Krieken; Ingrid Desar; Carla van Herpen; Cathy Maass; Rob de Waal; Peter Mulders; William Leenders Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Alexander B Stillebroer; Gerben M Franssen; Peter F A Mulders; Wim J G Oyen; Guus A M S van Dongen; Peter Laverman; Egbert Oosterwijk; Otto C Boerman Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Jeannette C Oosterwijk-Wakka; Mirjam C A de Weijert; Gerben M Franssen; William P J Leenders; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Otto C Boerman; Peter F A Mulders; Egbert Oosterwijk Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Alexander B Stillebroer; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wim J G Oyen; Peter F A Mulders; Otto C Boerman Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Jeannette C Oosterwijk-Wakka; Otto C Boerman; Peter F A Mulders; Egbert Oosterwijk Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Sanne A M van Lith; Fokko J Huizing; Gerben M Franssen; Bianca A W Hoeben; Jasper Lok; Sofia Doulkeridou; Otto C Boerman; Martin Gotthardt; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen; Johan Bussink; Sandra Heskamp Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 5.364