Literature DB >> 9406095

Lactation yields and accuracies computed from test day yields and (co)variances by best production.

P M VanRaden1.   

Abstract

Lactation records are calculated from data on milk, fat, and protein obtained from one or more milkings on several days during the lactation. The test interval method, which estimated missing daily milk yields by simple interpolation, was used for many years for standard monthly data but may not be as useful for the wider variety of test plans now being proposed. More accurate 305-d yields can be computed using best prediction, which has optimum properties if means and (co)variances are known and distribution is multivariate normal. The covariance of test day and 305-d yields is multiplied by the inverse of the test day (co)variance matrix, which is then multiplied by the test day deviation vector. This predicted 305-d deviation plus the mean 305-d yield equals the predicted 305-d yield. Similar algebraic methods are used to compute the correlation of true and estimated 305-d yields, which is needed to calculate lactation weights. Computation times were affordable but not trivial; they ranged from 0.001 to 1 s per lactation. Equations were modified to account for differing accuracies of data for partial days, means for multiple days, and data for unsupervised tests. Complete or incomplete lactations recorded with very different testing plans can be graphed and compared by best prediction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9406095     DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76268-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

Review 1.  Development of genetic evaluation for milk production traits of Holsteins in Japan.

Authors:  Koichi Hagiya
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.749

2.  Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work?

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wu; George R Wiggans; H Duane Norman; Asha M Miles; Curtis P Van Tassell; Ransom L Baldwin; Javier Burchard; João Dürr
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Holsteins favor heifers, not bulls: biased milk production programmed during pregnancy as a function of fetal sex.

Authors:  Katie Hinde; Abigail J Carpenter; John S Clay; Barry J Bradford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.

Authors:  Johann Ertl; Andrés Legarra; Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Christian Edel; Reiner Emmerling; Kay-Uwe Götz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.297

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.