Literature DB >> 9405725

Calcium supplementation suppresses bone resorption in early postmenopausal women.

F Scopacasa1, M Horowitz, J M Wishart, A G Need, H A Morris, G Wittert, B E Nordin.   

Abstract

In order to establish whether calcium supplementation suppresses bone resorption in early postmenopausal women and whether any response is related to calcium absorption status, we studied 22 healthy women (median age 52 years) all within 5 years of the menopause. Urine was collected between 9.00 p.m. and 9.00 a.m., and 9.00 a.m. and 9.00 p.m., (2 days) and a fasting blood and spot urine sample was obtained at 9 a.m. On the first day, 5 microCi of 45Ca in 250 ml water with 20 mg calcium carrier as the chloride was given at 9.00 a.m. and a further blood sample was obtained at 10.00 a.m. to measure calcium absorption. A 1 g calcium load was given at 9.00 p.m., immediately before the second 24-hour urine collection. There was a rise in plasma ionized calcium (1.18 +/- 0.010 mmol/liter versus 1. 21 +/- 0.011 mmol/liter, P < 0.01) and a fall in plasma PTH (4.2 +/- 0.34 pmol/liter versus 3.5 +/- 0.31 pmol/liter, P < 0.01) from baseline after the calcium load, and a trend for the magnitude of the change in PTH to be inversely related to calcium absorption (r = -0.33, P = 0.13). In the fasting spot urine samples, there were falls in hydroxyproline (OHPr/Cr; 14.6 +/- 0.71 versus 12.6 +/- 0.83, P < 0.001), pyridinoline (Pyr/Cr; 75 +/- 2.8 versus 70 +/- 3.5, P < 0.05), and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd/Cr; 22.7 +/- 1.2 versus 19.5 +/- 1. 1, P < 0.005) after the calcium load. The calcium load suppressed urinary Dpd/Cr between 9.00 p.m. and 9.00 a.m. (P < 0.005), but not between 9.00 a.m. and 9.00 p.m. We conclude that acute administration of a 1 g calcium load suppresses bone resorption in early postmenopausal women, probably by decreasing PTH secretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9405725     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Should the treatment of osteoporosis be more selective?

Authors:  B E Christopher Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The calcium controversy.

Authors:  B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Exploration of intestinal calcium precipitation as a barrier to absorption at high calcium doses.

Authors:  Sandra Goss; Pauline Rafferty; Jennifer Prushko; Eric Gorman; Mitchell Taub; Robin Bogner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Rapid suppression of bone resorption and parathyroid hormone secretion by acute oral administration of calcium in healthy adult men.

Authors:  S Ortolani; A Scotti; R Cherubini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Comparison of the effects of calcium loading with calcium citrate or calcium carbonate on bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anne M Kenny; Karen M Prestwood; Bradley Biskup; Bertha Robbins; Enid Zayas; Alison Kleppinger; Joseph A Burleson; Lawrence G Raisz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Circadian Variation in Efficacy of Medications.

Authors:  James C Walton; William H Walker; Jacob R Bumgarner; O Hecmarie Meléndez-Fernández; Jennifer A Liu; Heather L Hughes; Alexis L Kaper; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 6.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.