Literature DB >> 9405645

Conserved biological function between Pax-2 and Pax-5 in midbrain and cerebellum development: evidence from targeted mutations.

M Schwarz1, G Alvarez-Bolado, P Urbánek, M Busslinger, P Gruss.   

Abstract

The development of two major subdivisions of the vertebrate nervous system, the midbrain and the cerebellum, is controlled by signals emanating from a constriction in the neural primordium called the midbrain/hindbrain organizer (Joyner, A. L. (1996) Trends Genet. 12, 15-201). The closely related transcription factors Pax-2 and Pax-5 exhibit an overlapping expression pattern very early in the developing midbrain/hindbrain junction. Experiments carried out in fish (Krauss, S., Maden, M., Holder, N. & Wilson, S. W. (1992) Nature (London) 360, 87-89) with neutralizing antibodies against Pax-b, the orthologue of Pax-2 in mouse, placed this gene family in an regulatory cascade necessary for the development of the midbrain and the cerebellum. The targeted mutation of Pax-5 has been reported to have only slight effects in the development of structures derived from the isthmic constriction, whereas the Pax-2 null mutant mice show a background-dependent phenotype with varying penetrance. To test a possible redundant function between Pax-2 and Pax-5 we analyzed the brain phenotypes of mice expressing different dosages of both genes. Our results demonstrate a conserved biological function of both proteins in midbrain/hindbrain regionalization. Additionally, we show that one allele of Pax-2, but not Pax-5, is necessary and sufficient for midbrain and cerebellum development in C57BL/6 mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405645      PMCID: PMC25040          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice.

Authors:  E M Simpson; C C Linder; E E Sargent; M T Davisson; L E Mobraaten; J J Sharp
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Subtle cerebellar phenotype in mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of the En-2 homeobox.

Authors:  A L Joyner; K Herrup; B A Auerbach; C A Davis; J Rossant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  A segmental morphological paradigm for understanding vertebrate forebrains.

Authors:  L Puelles
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  The brain organization.

Authors:  S L Ang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Targeted disruption of the murine int-1 proto-oncogene resulting in severe abnormalities in midbrain and cerebellar development.

Authors:  K R Thomas; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The mouse Pax2(1Neu) mutation is identical to a human PAX2 mutation in a family with renal-coloboma syndrome and results in developmental defects of the brain, ear, eye, and kidney.

Authors:  J Favor; R Sandulache; A Neuhäuser-Klaus; W Pretsch; B Chatterjee; E Senft; W Wurst; V Blanquet; P Grimes; R Spörle; K Schughart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pax2 contributes to inner ear patterning and optic nerve trajectory.

Authors:  M Torres; E Gómez-Pardo; P Gruss
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Pax-2 expression in the murine neural plate precedes and encompasses the expression domains of Wnt-1 and En-1.

Authors:  D H Rowitch; A P McMahon
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.882

9.  Rescue of the En-1 mutant phenotype by replacement of En-1 with En-2.

Authors:  M Hanks; W Wurst; L Anson-Cartwright; A B Auerbach; A L Joyner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Multiple developmental defects in Engrailed-1 mutant mice: an early mid-hindbrain deletion and patterning defects in forelimbs and sternum.

Authors:  W Wurst; A B Auerbach; A L Joyner
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  22 in total

1.  Hes1 and Hes3 regulate maintenance of the isthmic organizer and development of the mid/hindbrain.

Authors:  H Hirata; K Tomita; Y Bessho; R Kageyama
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The regulatory utilization of genetic redundancy through responsive backup circuits.

Authors:  Ran Kafri; Melissa Levy; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A unilateral negative feedback loop between miR-200 microRNAs and Sox2/E2F3 controls neural progenitor cell-cycle exit and differentiation.

Authors:  Changgeng Peng; Na Li; Yen-Kar Ng; Jingzhong Zhang; Florian Meier; Fabian J Theis; Matthias Merkenschlager; Wei Chen; Wolfgang Wurst; Nilima Prakash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Retinoids and binding proteins in the cerebellum during lifetime.

Authors:  Rosalba Parenti; Federico Cicirata
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Dopaminergic neurons derived from BG01V2, a variant of human embryonic stem cell line BG01.

Authors:  Tandis Vazin; Jia Chen; Charles E Spivak; Rose Amable; Emily Gabitzsch; Chun-Ting Lee; Carl R Lupica; William J Freed
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  GABAergic neurons regulate lateral ventricular development via transcription factor Pax5.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Ohtsuka; Sylvia Badurek; Meinrad Busslinger; Francine M Benes; Liliana Minichiello; Uwe Rudolph
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  Intraflagellar transport protein 172 is essential for primary cilia formation and plays a vital role in patterning the mammalian brain.

Authors:  Marat Gorivodsky; Mahua Mukhopadhyay; Michaela Wilsch-Braeuninger; Matthew Phillips; Andreas Teufel; Changmee Kim; Nasir Malik; Wieland Huttner; Heiner Westphal
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Disruption of Foxg1 expression by knock-in of cre recombinase: effects on the development of the mouse telencephalon.

Authors:  K L Eagleson; L J Schlueter McFadyen-Ketchum; E T Ahrens; P H Mills; M D Does; J Nickols; P Levitt
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Transcription factor TEAD2 is involved in neural tube closure.

Authors:  Kotaro J Kaneko; Matthew J Kohn; Chengyu Liu; Melvin L DePamphilis
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  Otx2 regulates subtype specification and neurogenesis in the midbrain.

Authors:  Bertrand Vernay; Muriel Koch; Flora Vaccarino; James Briscoe; Antonio Simeone; Ryoichiro Kageyama; Siew-Lan Ang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.