Literature DB >> 9405587

Folate status response to controlled folate intake in pregnant women.

M A Caudill1, A C Cruz, J F Gregory, A D Hutson, L B Bailey.   

Abstract

A metabolic study (84-d) was conducted to investigate the folate status response of pregnant subjects (n = 12) during their second trimester and nonpregnant controls (n = 12) to folate intakes approximating the current (400 microg/d) and former (800 microg/d) recommended dietary allowance (RDA). The overall goal of the study was to provide metabolic data to assist in the interpretation of the current RDA for folate. Subjects were fed a controlled diet containing 120 +/- 15 microg/d (mean +/- SD) folate and either 330 or 730 microg/d synthetic folic acid. Outcome variables between and within supplementation groups were compared at steady state. Serum folate was higher (P </= 0.05) in pregnant women consuming 850 compared with 450 microg/d (44.6 +/- 13.4, 26.3 +/- 11.3 nmol/L, respectively, mean +/- SD). No differences (P > 0.05) were detected in serum folate between pregnant and nonpregnant women within the same supplementation group. Urinary 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate excretion was greater (P </= 0.05) in pregnant women consuming 850 compared with 450 microg/d (198.0 +/- 100.4, 9.5 +/- 3.2 nmol/d, respectively). No differences (P > 0.05) in 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate excretion were detected between pregnant and nonpregnant women within supplementation groups. Differences (P </= 0.05) were not detected in red cell folate between pregnant women consuming either 450 or 850 microg/d (1452.5 +/- 251.8, 1733.5 +/- 208.5 nmol/L, respectively) or between pregnant and nonpregnant women consuming 450 microg/d. Our data suggest that 450 microg/d (dietary folate + synthetic folic acid) is sufficient to maintain folate status in pregnant women. This level of intake equates to approximately 600 microg/d dietary equivalents, assuming 50 and 75% availability of dietary folate and synthetic folic acid consumed with meals, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405587     DOI: 10.1093/jn/127.12.2363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of multiple micronutrient deficiencies amongst pregnant women in a rural area of Haryana.

Authors:  Priyali Pathak; Umesh Kapil; Suresh Kumar Kapoor; Renu Saxena; Anand Kumar; Nandita Gupta; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Rajvir Singh; Preeti Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Absorption and blood/cellular transport of folate and cobalamin: Pharmacokinetic and physiological considerations.

Authors:  David H Alpers
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 3.  Large-Scale Food Fortification and Biofortification in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Programs, Trends, Challenges, and Evidence Gaps.

Authors:  Saskia J M Osendarp; Homero Martinez; Greg S Garrett; Lynnette M Neufeld; Luz Maria De-Regil; Marieke Vossenaar; Ian Darnton-Hill
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.069

Review 4.  Maternal folic acid and multivitamin supplementation: International clinical evidence with considerations for the prevention of folate-sensitive birth defects.

Authors:  R D Wilson; D L O'Connor
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Relative bioavailability of iron and folic acid from a new powdered supplement compared to a traditional tablet in pregnant women.

Authors:  Brenda Hartman-Craven; Anna Christofides; Deborah L O'Connor; Stanley Zlotkin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Nutrient intake values for folate during pregnancy and lactation vary widely around the world.

Authors:  Rosemary A Stamm; Lisa A Houghton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.