Literature DB >> 9403079

Experimental determinations of carcass processing by Plio-Pleistocene hominids and carnivores at FLK 22 (Zinjanthropus). Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.

S D Capaldo1.   

Abstract

Published and unpublished skeletal and surface mark data from the large, well-preserved, bovid dominated FLK 22 (Zinjanthropus) archaeofauna are analyzed using data derived from four different experimental control samples. The control samples are realistic because they are based on natural history and paleoecological data collected from FLK 22, and other Olduvai Gorge assemblages; they are precise because independent experimental studies following the same methods have generated the same results; and they restore generality to the study of site formation because each one models a different hominid and/or carnivore scenario of site formation. Comparability between FLK 22 and the control samples is established by excluding specimens from the former which do not meet identification and reporting standards derived from the latter. As in two previous studies, a comprehensive analysis of tooth marks and tool marks on long bone specimens from FLK 22 indicates that they were processed in three stages. In stage one, carnivores defleshed long bones, as inferred from the high percentage of tooth marks on midshaft fragments. In stage two, hominids processed intact long bones for marrow, as inferred from percussion mark percentages. Cut marks suggest that long bones retained flesh, but the amount, as yet, cannot be determined using cut mark percentages. In stage three, carnivores processed long bone epiphyses for grease, as inferred from the under-representation of long bone epiphyses and the high percentage of tooth marks on near-epiphyses and surviving epiphyses. The lack of comprehensive skeletal and surface mark data on cranial, axial, compact, and other specimens currently limits the application of experimental results. However, the available data suggest that the condition and representation of these items in the FLK 22 assemblage are also consistent with a carnivore to hominid to carnivore sequence of site formation. The variety of elements present, and their extensive processing by hominids, indicates that FLK 22 functioned as a central place/refuge where hominids could transport a variety of carcass parts and process them in an unhurried fashion. The presence of numerous small and medium sized individuals also indicates that hominids could have passively scavenged carcasses from a number of different sources including lions, leopards, sabertooth cats, and mass drownings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9403079     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Human nutrition in the context of evolutionary medicine].

Authors:  Alexander Ströhle; Maike Wolters; Andreas Hahn
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Learning by heart: cultural patterns in the faunal processing sequence during the middle pleistocene.

Authors:  Ruth Blasco; Jordi Rosell; Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; Sergi Lozano; Ignasi Pastó; David Riba; Manuel Vaquero; Josep Fernández Peris; Juan Luis Arsuaga; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Eudald Carbonell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Experimental butchering of a chimpanzee carcass for archaeological purposes.

Authors:  Palmira Saladié; Isabel Cáceres; Rosa Huguet; Antonio Rodríguez-Hidalgo; Borís Santander; Andreu Ollé; M Joana Gabucio; Patricia Martín; Juan Marín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Testing Dietary Hypotheses of East African Hominines Using Buccal Dental Microwear Data.

Authors:  Laura Mónica Martínez; Ferran Estebaranz-Sánchez; Jordi Galbany; Alejandro Pérez-Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differentiating percussion pits and carnivore tooth pits using 3D reconstructions and geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  José Yravedra; Julia Aramendi; Miguel Ángel Maté-González; Lloyd Austin Courtenay; Diego González-Aguilera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sabertooth carcass consumption behavior and the dynamics of Pleistocene large carnivoran guilds.

Authors:  Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; Charles P Egeland; Lucía Cobo-Sánchez; Enrique Baquedano; Richard C Hulbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Earliest archaeological evidence of persistent hominin carnivory.

Authors:  Joseph V Ferraro; Thomas W Plummer; Briana L Pobiner; James S Oliver; Laura C Bishop; David R Braun; Peter W Ditchfield; John W Seaman; Katie M Binetti; John W Seaman; Fritz Hertel; Richard Potts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lions as Bone Accumulators? Paleontological and Ecological Implications of a Modern Bone Assemblage from Olduvai Gorge.

Authors:  Mari Carmen Arriaza; Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; José Yravedra; Enrique Baquedano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The earliest cut marks of Europe: a discussion on hominin subsistence patterns in the Orce sites (Baza basin, SE Spain).

Authors:  M Patrocinio Espigares; Paul Palmqvist; Antonio Guerra-Merchán; Sergio Ros-Montoya; José Manuel García-Aguilar; Guillermo Rodríguez-Gómez; Francisco J Serrano; Bienvenido Martínez-Navarro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Early Pleistocene faunivorous hominins were not kleptoparasitic, and this impacted the evolution of human anatomy and socio-ecology.

Authors:  Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; Enrique Baquedano; Elia Organista; Lucía Cobo-Sánchez; Audax Mabulla; Vivek Maskara; Agness Gidna; Marcos Pizarro-Monzo; Julia Aramendi; Ana Belén Galán; Gabriel Cifuentes-Alcobendas; Marina Vegara-Riquelme; Blanca Jiménez-García; Natalia Abellán; Rebeca Barba; David Uribelarrea; David Martín-Perea; Fernando Diez-Martin; José Manuel Maíllo-Fernández; Antonio Rodríguez-Hidalgo; Lloyd Courtenay; Rocío Mora; Miguel Angel Maté-González; Diego González-Aguilera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.