Literature DB >> 9402905

Performance contracting for substance abuse treatment.

M Commons1, T G McGuire, M H Riordan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe an innovation in performance contracting for substance abuse services in the State of Maine and examine data on measured performance by providers before and after the innovation. DATA SOURCES AND COLLECTION: From the Maine Addiction Treatment System (MATS), an admission and discharge data set collected by the Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA). The MATS data for this study include information on clients of programs receiving public funding from October 1, 1989 through June 30, 1994. Additional data are drawn from the contracts between the state and providers, and from service delivery reports submitted to OSA. STUDY
DESIGN: Client-level performance measures were calculated directly from MATS using OSA's formulas and standards, and then aggregated to the treatment program level. Multivariate regression analysis was done for each performance indicator as a dependent variable with performance contracting, time, extent of state funding, and provider characteristics as independent variables. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Performance contracting is positively related to better performance for effectiveness indicators overall. Individual effectiveness indicators that showed improvement include drug use indicators (abstinence and reduction in use) and social functioning indicators. In addition, performance contracting is associated with an increase in efficiency performance, defined as delivery of the contracted amount of service, for agencies that depend heavily on OSA for funding. Finally, performance contracting appears unrelated to the special populations indicators that measure services to target populations that OSA considers harder to treat.
CONCLUSIONS: There is tentative evidence of a relationship between provider performance and the introduction of performance contracting. More definite conclusions await more detailed analyses of client-level data.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9402905      PMCID: PMC1070219     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  6 in total

1.  Privatization in health and human services: a critique.

Authors:  S R Smith; M Lipsky
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 2.  Patient treatment matching: a conceptual and methodological review with suggestions for future research.

Authors:  A T McLellan; A I Alterman
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1991

3.  From theory to practice: the planned treatment of drug users. Interview by Stanley Einstein.

Authors:  W McAuliffe
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1989-06

4.  The promise and pitfalls of purchase-of-service contracts.

Authors:  R A Dorwart; M Schlesinger; R T Pulice
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1986-09

5.  Retrospective self-reports by clients differ from original reports: implications for the evaluation of drug treatment programs.

Authors:  L S Aiken
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1986-07

6.  The validity of methadone clients' self-reported drug use.

Authors:  S Magura; D Goldsmith; C Casriel; P J Goldstein; D S Lipton
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1987-08
  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Performance-based funding of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: vocational rehabilitation and employment staff perspectives.

Authors:  John H McGrew; Jason K Johannesen; Melina E Griss; Dennis L Born; Colleen Hart Katuin
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Performance contracting and quality improvement in outpatient treatment: effects on waiting time and length of stay.

Authors:  Maureen T Stewart; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Grant Ritter; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-03-23

3.  Pay-for-performance in a community substance abuse clinic.

Authors:  Ryan Vandrey; Maxine L Stitzer; Shauna P Acquavita; Patricia Quinn-Stabile
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-04-12

4.  Agency-level financial incentives and electronic reminders to improve continuity of care after discharge from residential treatment and detoxification.

Authors:  Andrea Acevedo; Margaret T Lee; Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Grant A Ritter; Lee Panas; Kevin Campbell; Jason Bean-Mortinson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Adolescent treatment initiation and engagement in an evidence-based practice initiative.

Authors:  Margaret T Lee; Deborah W Garnick; Peggy L O'Brien; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Andrea Acevedo; Bryan R Garner; Rodney R Funk; Mark D Godley
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 6.  Can We Pay for Performance in Behavioral Health Care?

Authors:  Rebecca E Stewart; Ishara Lareef; Trevor R Hadley; David S Mandell
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Incentives in a public addiction treatment system: Effects on waiting time and selection.

Authors:  Maureen T Stewart; Sharon Reif; Beth Dana; AnMarie Nguyen; Maria Torres; Margot T Davis; Grant Ritter; Dominic Hodgkin; Constance M Horgan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-09-07

8.  Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system.

Authors:  Yujing Shen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Is it feasible to pay specialty substance use disorder treatment programs based on patient outcomes?

Authors:  Dominic Hodgkin; Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Alisa B Busch; Maureen T Stewart; Sharon Reif
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: the Delaware experiment.

Authors:  A Thomas McLellan; Jack Kemp; Adam Brooks; Deni Carise
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.