Literature DB >> 9402650

Matching object size by controlling finger span and hand shape.

M Santello1, J F Soechting.   

Abstract

The ability of human subjects to accurately control finger span (distance between thumb and one finger) was studied. The experiments were performed without visual feedback of the hand and were designed to study the dependence of accuracy on object size, shape, distance, orientation and finger configuration. The effects of finger combination and sensory modality used to perceive object size (vision and haptics) were also studied. Subjects were quite proficient at this task; the small errors tended to be predominantly negative, i.e., finger span < object size. The thumb-little finger combination was less accurate than the other finger combinations, irrespective of the sensory modality used. Subjects made larger under-estimating errors when matching the size of cylinders than when matching cubes and parallelepipeds. No effect of viewing distance, object orientation and finger configuration was found. Accuracy in matching object size was not dependent on the sensory modality used. The question of how the individual degrees of freedom of the fingers and thumb contributed to the control of finger span was also addressed. Principal components analysis showed that two components could characterize the hand postures used, irrespective of object size. The amplitude of the first principal component was constant, and the amplitude of the second scaled linearly with object size. This finding suggests that all of the degrees of freedom of the hand are controlled as a unit. This result is discussed in relation to the 'virtual finger' hypothesis for grasping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9402650     DOI: 10.1080/08990229771060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  27 in total

1.  Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superposition of principal components.

Authors:  T D Sanger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp.

Authors:  Sara A Winges; Douglas J Weber; Marco Santello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance.

Authors:  Jae K Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Prehension synergies in three dimensions.

Authors:  Jae Kun Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Finger movements during reach-to-grasp in the monkey: amplitude scaling of a temporal synergy.

Authors:  Lalin S Theverapperuma; Claudia M Hendrix; Carolyn R Mason; Timothy J Ebner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  L J Berryman; J M Yau; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neuromuscular determinants of force coordination during multidigit grasping.

Authors:  J A Johnston; S A Winges; M Santello
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Effects of friction at the digit-object interface on the digit forces in multi-finger prehension.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Xun Niu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Adjustments to local friction in multifinger prehension.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.