Literature DB >> 9401844

Screening for colorectal neoplasia with faecal occult blood testing compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy directly in a 55-56 years' old population.

H Brevinge1, E Lindholm, S Buntzen, J Kewenter.   

Abstract

Reduced mortality from colorectal cancer may be achieved by screening with faecal occult blood testing. Screening for neoplasia in the rectum and sigmoid colon with flexible sigmoidoscopy is suggested to be more effective, particular among persons between 50 and 60 years of age. A cohort of 6367 persons 55-56 years of age were randomised to screening with rehydrated Hemoccult II tests (HII group) or with flexible videosigmoidoscopy directly (FS group). In the HII group 59% (1893/3183) attended, compared to 49% (1353/3184) in the FS group. Of the 1893 persons who attended in the HII group, 4% had a positive HII test and in 13% (10/78) of them a neoplasm > or = 1 cm in the rectum or sigmoid colon was diagnosed by endoscopy. The corresponding rate in the FS group was 2.3%. Overall the number of persons with a neoplasm > or = 1 cm diagnosed in the HII group was 10 and in the FS group 31. A subgroup in the flexible sigmoidoscopy group, who also performed rehydrated HII tests, showed a sensitivity of the HII test for neoplasia > or = 1 cm of 26% and a specificity of 95.6%. To find a neoplasm > or = 1 cm in the rectum or sigmoid colon, 44 examinations were needed when using flexible sigmoidoscopy directly and 7 examinations when only those with positive HII tests were examined. In mass screening for neoplasia in the rectum and sigmoid colon, the relatively low prevalence of colorectal neoplasia at 55-56 years of age makes primary selection with rehydrated Hemoccult testing an alternative to the resource-consuming endoscopy of all invited persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9401844     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  L Sharp; L Tilson; S Whyte; A O'Ceilleachair; C Walsh; C Usher; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; M Barry; H Comber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of fecal occult blood test for the detection of colorectal cancer in hospital settings.

Authors:  Salah H Elsafi; Norah I Alqahtani; Nawaf Y Zakary; Eidan M Al Zahrani
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Emily T Vella; Nancy N Baxter; Catherine Dubé; Michael Gould; Amanda Hey; Nofisat Ismaila; Bronwen R McCurdy; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-14

4.  Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Lesley Tilson; Sophie Whyte; Alan O Ceilleachair; Cathal Walsh; Cara Usher; Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Anthony Staines; Michael Barry; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Michael Bretthauer; Atle Fretheim; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01

6.  Effect of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the outcomes of subsequent faecal occult blood test screening.

Authors:  Jeremy P Brown; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Suzanne Wright; Amanda J Cross; Wendy S Atkin
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.