Literature DB >> 9401424

Effects of attentional and stressor manipulations on the P50 gating response.

P M White1, C M Yee.   

Abstract

The decline in amplitude of the P50 component of the event-related potential to the second of paired clicks has been suggested as a measure of preattentional gating. Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of attention and a psychological stressor on P50. Experiment 1 included two choice reaction time tasks designed to direct attention selectively to the first or second click in each pair. Results suggest that the N100 component was responsive to attentional manipulations, whereas P50 was not affected. Experiment 2 examined the impact of a brief psychological stressor on the P50 response. Parallel mental arithmetic tasks were administered silently and orally. Self-report and measures of autonomic activity were used to assess the level of stress occurring during the performance of the mental arithmetic tasks. Results indicate that P50 suppression was sensitive to the acute stressor, the oral mental arithmetic task. Implications of these findings for studies of P50 suppression in schizophrenia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9401424     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  20 in total

1.  Relevance of attention in auditory sensory gating paradigms in schizophrenia A pilot study.

Authors:  Klevest Gjini; Scott Burroughs; Nash N Boutros
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.333

2.  Phenomenological dimensions of sensory gating.

Authors:  William P Hetrick; Molly A Erickson; David A Smith
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Gamma and beta neural activity evoked during a sensory gating paradigm: effects of auditory, somatosensory and cross-modal stimulation.

Authors:  Michael A Kisley; Zoe M Cornwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  P50 sensory gating and attentional performance.

Authors:  Li Wan; Bruce H Friedman; Nash N Boutros; Helen J Crawford
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Attention modulates topology and dynamics of auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Miljenka Jelena Jurasic; Ana Susac; Ralph Huonker; Theresa Gotz; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Auditory sensory gating in young adolescents with early-onset psychosis: a comparison with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Cecilie Koldbæk Lemvigh; Jens Richardt Møllegaard Jepsen; Birgitte Fagerlund; Anne Katrine Pagsberg; Birte Yding Glenthøj; Jacob Rydkjær; Bob Oranje
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 7.  Sensory gating: a translational effort from basic to clinical science.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Ryan P Mears; Li Wan; Nash N Boutros
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Novel environment and GABA agonists alter event-related potentials in N-methyl-D-aspartate NR1 hypomorphic and wild-type mice.

Authors:  Christina L Bodarky; Tobias B Halene; Richard S Ehrlichman; Anamika Banerjee; Rabindranath Ray; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Gerald Jonak; Steven J Siegel
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Cortical gating of oropharyngeal sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Karen Wheeler-Hegland; Teresa Pitts; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.